+- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com)
+-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards)
+--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More)
+--- Thread: NFL: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow (/Thread-NFL-Mark-Sanchez-vs-Tim-Tebow)
RE: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - ATLBound - 12-05-2012 02:34 AM
(12-04-2012 10:46 PM)AUTiger7222 Wrote: 12 TD, 6 INT
15 TD, 13 INT
Yeah! Vick is so much better than Tebow!
You seriously have some type of love jones for Tebow.
First you said in an older thread that Tebow didn't get enough credit for what happened in Denver
Now you're saying him and Vick are the same...
Your evaluation of Tebow is quite retarded.
RE: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - Drathdon - 12-05-2012 09:22 AM
Analysis that a playoff-winning QB (ham-stringed by a losing record before he got the starting gig) can never be an NFL QB is just as retarded, in my mind.
Both sides seem hell-bent on ignoring the middle ground between their two extremes.
RE: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - Aftermath - 12-05-2012 11:05 AM
(12-05-2012 09:22 AM)Drathdon Wrote: Analysis that a playoff-winning QB (ham-stringed by a losing record before he got the starting gig) can never be an NFL QB is just as retarded, in my mind.
Both sides seem hell-bent on ignoring the middle ground between their two extremes.
The middle ground between Vick and a pile of shit still isn't going to be much of a QB.
RE: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - Drathdon - 12-05-2012 04:34 PM
With teams like Arizona showing how bad some teams can be at the position, saying Tebow isn't qualified for a job seems purposefully ignoring facts. Not every QB in the NFL will be amazing, but many will still have jobs.
Ol' Charlie Batch just won a game, for Heaven's sake!
RE: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - AUTiger7222 - 12-05-2012 05:15 PM
(12-05-2012 02:34 AM)ATLBound Wrote: You seriously have some type of love jones for Tebow.
First you said in an older thread that Tebow didn't get enough credit for what happened in Denver
Now you're saying him and Vick are the same...
Your evaluation of Tebow is quite retarded.
How? I posted the numbers of what Tebow did last year compared to what one of the years Vick had for us (2005). The numbers all favor Tebow except for completion percentage. 12 TDs and 6 INTs that Tebow had is better than 15 TDs and 13 INTs Vick had.
I have yet to hear or see 1 legit argument against Tebow on why he shouldn't be given the chance to play QB in the NFL. Vick got a chance. Why not Tebow? Until someone presents a legit case against Tebow I will continue to support Tebow's case for getting a chance.
Re: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - juraitwaluzka - 12-05-2012 05:27 PM
I would rather have Tebow than Gabbert
RE: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - mdrake34 - 12-05-2012 05:29 PM
(12-05-2012 05:27 PM)juraitwaluzka Wrote: I would rather have Tebow than Gabbert
That's like saying you'd rather have the clap than herpes.
Re: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - juraitwaluzka - 12-05-2012 06:36 PM
Actually I would!!!
RE: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - ATLBound - 12-05-2012 06:50 PM
(12-05-2012 04:34 PM)Drathdon Wrote: With teams like Arizona showing how bad some teams can be at the position, saying Tebow isn't qualified for a job seems purposefully ignoring facts. Not every QB in the NFL will be amazing, but many will still have jobs.
Ol' Charlie Batch just won a game, for Heaven's sake!
I dont think you want to use the term 'ignoring stats' in the same sentence that is supporting Tebow. Every last supporter of Tebow actually ignore stats and use only the win/loss record and of course his substantial personality and will to win as a basis for his support.
If you're supporting Tebow, then stats are the furthest things you should stay away from.
Let's put it like this. Tebow can play a different position
on the field and still use his will to win. I can't have my quarterback suck for 3 quarters of every game. As in the case when he played the Patriots, the defense can't always hold you up.
The goal of every team in the league is to win a Super Bowl. How many in here truthfully believe they can win a Super Bowl with Tebow at QB.
Using Charlie Batch, he had the luxury of having Pittsburgh defense.
RE: Mark Sanchez vs. Tim Tebow - ATLBound - 12-05-2012 06:53 PM
(12-05-2012 05:15 PM)AUTiger7222 Wrote: How? I posted the numbers of what Tebow did last year compared to what one of the years Vick had for us (2005). The numbers all favor Tebow except for completion percentage. 12 TDs and 6 INTs that Tebow had is better than 15 TDs and 13 INTs Vick had.
I have yet to hear or see 1 legit argument against Tebow on why he shouldn't be given the chance to play QB in the NFL. Vick got a chance. Why not Tebow? Until someone presents a legit case against Tebow I will continue to support Tebow's case for getting a chance.
What were Vicks rushing numbers that year? Let me also say Tebow would NEVER have a year like Vick's 2010 year. As much of a one year wonder it was, it was still better than Tebow's one year wonder.
He doesn't even practice well. What player you know gets a chance when they can't practice well?