+- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com)
+-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards)
+--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More)
+--- Thread: NFL: Tampa Bay Bucaneers (/Thread-NFL-Tampa-Bay-Bucaneers)
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - AsylumGuido - 05-18-2012 07:52 PM
(05-18-2012 07:50 PM)ChrisD Wrote: I can say the same about both the Falcons and threw Saints that year almost. I mean with a few of their wins.
Imo there are only 2.or 3 truly shit teams right more. Browns, Jaguars, Raiders (as.much as they always show flashes ov promise..)
Maybe you could put the Colts on thee but last year imo was an anomolly. (did I spell that right?)
Point being since I would say the 2007 or 2008 season, the entire NFL has grown a lot more even. Its hard to say any wins are easy to get anymore. Omitting blowouts of course.
I think that this year we will see a little bit more of the 2010 Bucs. They'll put up a respectable 9-7 imo.
I respectfully disagree and say that six wins is likely and seven would mean that the Falcons lost one to them because the Saints won't.
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - pauliwood - 05-19-2012 11:09 AM
(05-18-2012 07:52 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: I respectfully disagree and say that six wins is likely and seven would mean that the Falcons lost one to them because the Saints won't.
Eh, We do play them week 17, so they might have an outside chance in a meaningless game vs. our B squad.
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - Radical - 05-19-2012 11:10 AM
Didn't think much of the the Bucs last year, and don't think much of them this year either.
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - DemBirds - 05-20-2012 05:29 PM
(05-18-2012 01:53 PM)cnasty Wrote: Let's also remember that a lot of those wins were against shit teams.
Yeah, they did beat the Saints.
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - AsylumGuido - 05-20-2012 05:59 PM
(05-20-2012 05:29 PM)DemBirds Wrote: Yeah, they did beat the Saints.
Yes, that is true. More than you can say about the Falcons.
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - DemBirds - 05-20-2012 06:26 PM
(05-20-2012 05:59 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Yes, that is true. More than you can say about the Falcons.
I'm referring to 2010, so actually the Falcons did beat the Saints.
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - pauliwood - 05-20-2012 06:27 PM
(05-20-2012 06:26 PM)DemBirds Wrote: I'm referring to 2010, so actually the Falcons did beat the Saints.
Fixed it for ya.
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - AsylumGuido - 05-20-2012 06:56 PM
(05-20-2012 06:26 PM)DemBirds Wrote: I'm referring to 2010, so actually the Falcons did beat the Saints.
Ah, yes, 2010. Most of the starters sat out the game and the rest didn't finish.
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - ATLBound - 05-20-2012 07:34 PM
(05-20-2012 06:56 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Ah, yes, 2010. Most of the starters sat out the game and the rest didn't finish.
I guess you're talking about the Bucs....
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers - AsylumGuido - 05-21-2012 10:58 AM
(05-20-2012 07:34 PM)ATLBound Wrote: I guess you're talking about the Bucs....
Yup. That was the final game back in 2010. The Saints were locked into the #5 seed and the outcome of the game meant nothing.