![]() |
|
NFL: Saints Bounty Thread - Printable Version +- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com) +-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards) +--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More) +--- Thread: NFL: Saints Bounty Thread (/Thread-NFL-Saints-Bounty-Thread) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 |
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Jesus - 07-10-2012 01:38 PM John Clayton on the Saints/Brees situation link Quote:The delay in the Saints getting a long-term deal done with Drew Brees has been one of the most baffling stories of the NFL offseason. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 07-10-2012 01:43 PM Speaking of being absolute, I hate that people automatically think that every defensive player has the same intent of inflicting as much pain as possible. Thats not the case. There is a reason besides talent that some players are better than others. Some people are lazy, don't work hard om their craft, afraid of injury if they hit too hard. Some players may have personal problems affecting their play or don't want to play hard for the coaches. Some players may just play the bare minimum bc they are good enough and it's an easy check. Not every defemsive player will hit as hard as they can on every single play. That's foolishness so that excuse shouldn't be used again. Sorry for the rant but everytime I hear a fan, media member, or even ex or current players say that it irks me. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 07-10-2012 01:52 PM (07-10-2012 01:33 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Several Saints players and more than one media type have heard from the coaches themselves, directly or through third parties, that they were directed to keep their mouths shut. Both Payton and Williams have a stipulation in their suspensions that require reinstatement. Goodell is clearly holding that over their heads.Does this make it a fact or just and "educated" guess? Remember how Beef was explaining there is no need to keep your "ducks in a row" or no need to deny something that isn't there in the first place without it being there. Same thing Guido. It's an educated guess based on proper logic but it doesn't necessarily make ot a fact or true. You and the others on the Saints side as I said want it to be true so you make a decision or an assumption but its not a fact. I can't imagine a conversation goes like that and if it did then Goodell could be in huge trouble I think. That would be considered some form of blackmail. "Keep your mouth shut about this lie I'm about to tell in regards to the Saints Payton or Gregg and I will reinstate you" Really that sounds plausible to you. Like I said let's stick to the facts. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Anomaly - 07-10-2012 02:05 PM Oh great the lunatic is back. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Templar - 07-10-2012 03:44 PM oh fuck. It's like thinking you've beaten cancer, then getting a test result back that it's come out of remission. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 07-10-2012 03:56 PM (07-10-2012 03:44 PM)Templar Wrote: oh fuck. Bwahaha ok I'll stop RE: Saints Bounty Thread - JDaveG - 07-10-2012 04:37 PM
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - mdrake34 - 07-10-2012 04:41 PM (07-10-2012 01:16 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Goodell has already stated that there were only three witnesses that gave testimony, Gregg Williams, Joe Vitt and one other person. It has since come to light that Mike Cerullo was that other person and the one that came up with the supposed ledger that has since been questioned for it's accuracy and authenticity. Cerullo also recanted on what he claimed this past April about Vilma and Vitt has denied that he ever verified that a bounty system was in place. After Vitt's denial Goodell said he still has two credible witnesses, if you can call Cerullo credible and Williams has been ordered to keep his mouth shut.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - pauliwood - 07-10-2012 05:47 PM
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - mdrake34 - 07-10-2012 05:51 PM Waiting till the last minute eh? All is well eh? http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8153671/drew-brees-new-orleans-saints-skip-training-camp-contract-sources-say If Drew Brees does not have a long-term contract in place by Monday's 4 p.m. ET deadline, the New Orleans Saints quarterback has no plans to sign his franchise tender and report to training camp, according to league and team sources. NFC South blog Yasinskas ESPN.com's Pat Yasinskas writes about all things NFC South in his division blog. • Blog network: NFL Nation The Saints have offered Brees a contract that would average $19.25 million per year, or slightly more than the $19.2 million the Denver Broncos gave Peyton Manning, sources said. Brees is seeking $20.5 million per year and is using his six years with the Saints to justify his position. Since signing with New Orleans prior to the 2006 season, Brees has emerged statistically as the league's most prolific passer, accumulated more victories than any starting quarterback and won both a Super Bowl title and MVP during the 2009 season. Neither side offered any immediate comment. A Saints official acknowledged Brees' position but was hopeful the gap could be bridged between now and July 16. Any player designated as a franchise player has until Monday's deadline to reach a long-term agreement. After that deadline, the player can only play by signing his franchise tag. |