![]() |
|
NFL: Saints Bounty Thread - Printable Version +- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com) +-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards) +--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More) +--- Thread: NFL: Saints Bounty Thread (/Thread-NFL-Saints-Bounty-Thread) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 |
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-18-2012 01:46 PM (06-17-2012 11:45 PM)RFlagg Wrote: No. I am just part of the growing tide that believes the Saints have been totally railroaded by Goodell and that he has terribly underestimated his power over the players. The coaches and front office were threatened to keep their mouths shut when he suspended them. He has discovered that the players are going to take the bogus punishment lying down. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-18-2012 01:52 PM (06-17-2012 04:04 PM)ATLBound Wrote: Sad things is they are trying to deny Shanle's admittance of it. He admitted to it. All he said was that it wasn't as bad as the NFL is making it out to be but Shanle admitted to the cartoffs and confirmed the contents of the ledger Shanle did not admit to anything about a bounty on opposing players. THAT is what they were accused of. They were accused of INTENTIONALLY injuring opponents for pay. Shanle admitted to a pay for performance program and said that Gregg Williams used terms like whacks and cartoffs referring to legal hard hits. That is not a bounty as Goodell described to the press. The supposed ledger, which wasn't used as evidence at the appeal sham today, does not support the existence of bounties or intentional injuries to opponents. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-18-2012 01:56 PM (06-17-2012 12:30 AM)hitwriter Wrote: The post punishment/suspension evidence would be included/presented in the appeal process and must from what I understand therefore be shared. It was shared, although not by the 72 hour deadline prior to the appeal as the CBA demands. Reports are that it included the Shanle article, the Pamphilon tape and a power point of quotes from Gregg Williams. Reportedly, it did not contain any evidence whatsoever supporting the claim of a bounty program. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - TeamPlayer1 - 06-18-2012 02:06 PM (06-18-2012 01:56 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: It was shared, although not by the 72 hour deadline prior to the appeal as the CBA demands. Reports are that it included the Shanle article, the Pamphilon tape and a power point of quotes from Gregg Williams. Reportedly, it did not contain any evidence whatsoever supporting the claim of a bounty program. The CBA calls for 3 calendar days not 72 hours. Vilma's lawyer is trying to twist the timeline. If the NFL provided any criteria anytime Friday the 15th that would satisfy the 3 calendar days. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - phocis850 - 06-18-2012 02:33 PM You know what's awesome. I don't care what happens to the Saints. I don't care if they are guilty or not. I'm just surprised that you haven't learned anything yet Guido. You don't know a damn thing. Nor do we or anyone else. That's how it goes. Deal with it when we DO know something. Don't blurt out facts saying this and that until all the evidence is presented. Until then its all just speculation and opinion. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 06-18-2012 03:09 PM (06-18-2012 01:52 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Shanle did not admit to anything about a bounty on opposing players. THAT is what they were accused of. They were accused of INTENTIONALLY injuring opponents for pay. Shanle admitted to a pay for performance program and said that Gregg Williams used terms like whacks and cartoffs referring to legal hard hits. That is not a bounty as Goodell described to the press. The supposed ledger, which wasn't used as evidence at the appeal sham today, does not support the existence of bounties or intentional injuries to opponents. Shanle said if the legal hits lead to an injury then they still got paid for it, which means they got paid for injuries. The intent doesn't matter. This falls in line with why Shanle said it wasn't as bad as the NFL was making it out to be. RE: Saints Bounty Thread - NZFalcon - 06-18-2012 05:07 PM (06-18-2012 01:52 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Gregg Williams used terms like whacks and cartoffs referring to legal hard hits.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Anomaly - 06-18-2012 05:39 PM https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/214831024297885696 Quote:@SI_PeterKing https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/214831479946088449 Quote:@SI_PeterKing https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/214831867675947009 Quote:@SI_PeterKing RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 06-18-2012 05:45 PM (06-18-2012 05:39 PM)Anomaly Wrote: https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/214831024297885696Let the denial resume. :/ RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Anomaly - 06-18-2012 05:55 PM https://twitter.com/realfreemancbs/status/214834969359564800 Quote:@realfreemancbs https://twitter.com/realfreemancbs/status/214835307051352064 Quote:@realfreemancbs https://twitter.com/realfreemancbs/status/214835494113124353 Quote:@realfreemancbs https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/214837979728969728 Quote: @AdamSchefter |