NFL: Saints Bounty Thread - Printable Version
+- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com)
+-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards)
+--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More)
+--- Thread: NFL: Saints Bounty Thread (/Thread-NFL-Saints-Bounty-Thread)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - TeamPlayer1 - 06-16-2012 11:02 PM
You don't seem to get it Guido! The arbitrators have ruled that Goodell has the ultimate power to discipline players and you realize that he does not have to tell the players squat.
If Goodell says you are guilty, you can appeal to him and you are still guilty. The Saints are getting what they deserve and nothing you or any aint's fans say does not matter.
Maybe when Goodell finally meets with the players he willl add some suspensions to some other players involved. After all the NFLPA told the players to not meet with Goodell earlier.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 06-16-2012 11:15 PM
I with Drathdon because all these articles mean nothing. The media hasn't "realized" anything about being duped. The only person claiming this is Times-Picayune and Mike Florio. That's your media I guess.
They did it....move on. Otherwise I will continue to enjoy you going crazy over it.
Honestly this thread means nothing...the players and coaches will remain suspended. You won't get to see all the evidence. Previously you claimed all the evidence was given, then there came more and yet again you claim there isn't anymore evidence. So there is a cycle going on here and it's crazy that you have yet to see it and you possibly never will which is sad to say the least. Good luck in making the Saints look innocent on a Falcons message board.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Dale4Saul2Red0 - 06-16-2012 11:48 PM
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - hitwriter - 06-17-2012 12:20 AM
(06-15-2012 07:31 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Of course they are, but they were threatened by Goodell to keep there mouths shut if they wanted back in the league. There have been reports of this recently ... at least the part of not talking about it at all.
Where's the evidence on this... now you are using heresay?
Show me the proof Goodell threatened anyone with banishment from the league if they didn't keep their mouths shut!
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - hitwriter - 06-17-2012 12:30 AM
(06-16-2012 04:42 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Even more disturbing - and awfully ironic - is that part of the evidence the NFL did share with players was a column I wrote last week after talking with linebacker Scott Shanle. For one thing, that article was written well after the league handed out its punishments, so it shouldn't have had any bearing on the punishments handed out by the league (the same goes for a recent essay written by filmmaker Sean Pamphilon that the NFL included Friday).
The post punishment/suspension evidence would be included/presented in the appeal process and must from what I understand therefore be shared.
They (the NFL) must feel it validates prior evidence.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 06-17-2012 04:04 PM
Sad things is they are trying to deny Shanle's admittance of it. He admitted to it. All he said was that it wasn't as bad as the NFL is making it out to be but Shanle admitted to the cartoffs and confirmed the contents of the ledger
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - RFlagg - 06-17-2012 11:45 PM
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-18-2012 01:30 PM
(06-16-2012 09:04 PM)Drathdon Wrote: Sorry, I enjoy watching the Aints implode, and replying to see just how delusional Guido will get. It's to one thread guys. Make others and ignore this one if it gets to you.
The player know that they are NOT guilty of participating in a bounty program. There were no bounties. Goodell has not shown any proof of bounties because it does not exist. He simply twisted a run of the mill pay for performance pool that exists throughout the NFL and made it out to be some sort of bounty program.
Explain why he presented ZERO evidence of Vilma offering $10,000 to teammates to injury Favre and Warner. THAT is what Vilma was accused of doing, yet, there was no evidence presented preceding the appeal sham today that showed that that actually happened.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-18-2012 01:33 PM
(06-16-2012 11:02 PM)TeamPlayer1 Wrote: You don't seem to get it Guido! The arbitrators have ruled that Goodell has the ultimate power to discipline players and you realize that he does not have to tell the players squat.
You don't get it. The CBA demands that Goodell share all evidence to be used in the appeal hearing to support his discipline. So, yes, he DOES have to tell the players squat.
Of course, it is impossible to share evidence that doesn't exist. There was no bounty program as claimed.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-18-2012 01:42 PM
(06-16-2012 11:15 PM)ATLBound Wrote: I with Drathdon because all these articles mean nothing. The media hasn't "realized" anything about being duped. The only person claiming this is Times-Picayune and Mike Florio. That's your media I guess.
Of course they will remain suspended. But, they will continue to fight to clear their names because there was no bounty system as claimed.
And, all of the evidence of there having being a bounty system was already shared weeks ago. The was the emails from Ornstein joking about a bounty. And there was a declaration from Hargrove that didn't mention anything about a bounty system existing. Then there was a tape of Gregg Williams being Gregg Williams that once again did not support the existence of a bounty being placed upon an opposing player as originally claimed.
Nothing that has been shared since then has proven that there was anything more than a pay for performance pool going on. Nothing. Zero. Zilch. Nada.