+- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com)
+-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards)
+--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More)
+--- Thread: NFL: Saints Bounty Thread (/Thread-NFL-Saints-Bounty-Thread)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-08-2012 07:36 PM
(06-08-2012 07:11 PM)JDaveG Wrote: "Sinister?" Depends on what you mean by that.
I think the Saints organization is run by a bunch of first class assholes who think the rules don't apply to them and kept running a pay for performance program that included specific payments for injuring opposing players even after they were asked by the league to stop. So that hasn't changed. But I don't know what you think I thought before, so it's hard to comment on the version of "what I believed from the start" that you think existed.
I know the league came to them after the 2010 playoffs and said that they were accused of placing a bounty on a Viking player. They found no evidence of it happening, but told the Saints not to undertake this practice in the future. If you research back it had nothing to do with a pay for performance program back then. It was all based upon a claim of a bounty on a Viking player.
Well, if they never placed a bounty on a player they complied with the demand, right?
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-08-2012 07:44 PM
(06-08-2012 07:11 PM)JDaveG Wrote: "Sinister?" Depends on what you mean by that.
I think the Saints organization is run by a bunch of first class assholes who think the rules don't apply to them and kept running a pay for performance program that included specific payments for injuring opposing players even after they were asked by the league to stop. So that hasn't changed. But I don't know what you think I thought before, so it's hard to comment on the version of "what I believed from the start" that you think existed.
But what if it was run by a cocky coach that some people do not like, especially those fans from a team he has dominated (not gloating, just fact), and beyond that was just in the wrong place at the wrong time to give Goodell a target to show his compassion for the players?
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - papachaz - 06-08-2012 08:57 PM
(06-08-2012 07:11 PM)JDaveG Wrote: "Sinister?" Depends on what you mean by that.
I think the Saints organization is run by a bunch of first class assholes who think the rules don't apply to them and kept running a pay for performance program that included specific payments for injuring opposing players even after they were asked by the league to stop. So that hasn't changed. But I don't know what you think I thought before, so it's hard to comment on the version of "what I believed from the start" that you think existed.
pretty well sums it up for me too, well said sir +1
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 06-08-2012 09:02 PM
(06-08-2012 08:57 PM)papachaz Wrote: pretty well sums it up for me too, well said sir +1
Well, I guess you both are wrong and more importantly, the Saints, while undergoing a few pressures, will once again dominate the division.
Think about it. How bad will it feel if your Falcons can't handle the Saints after this off-season? Huh?
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 06-08-2012 09:07 PM
(06-08-2012 06:36 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: No chance either of those grievances would fly. I'm just hoping that more of this watered down "evidence" keeps surfacing showing that the Saints players were not the villains as they had been originally been portrayed. Yes, they were guilty of a pay for performance program, but they did not have bounties on opposing players as was plastered all over the media for weeks.This is an example of the bargain stage folks.
They weren't playing the game on the field any differently than any other team attempts to play.
He is progressing slowly but he is coming along and that's all that matters.
I, ATLBound, hereby certify that Asylum Guido has progressed to the Bargain stage of Denial. He has shown slow progress but he graduates with the honoe or becoming our most improved student.
Now wheres that Yolo001 guy that was "helping" Guido out before? Is that his name?
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Jesus - 06-08-2012 09:08 PM
62 pages and all I can say is:
FUCK THE SAINTS
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 06-08-2012 09:30 PM
(06-08-2012 09:02 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Well, I guess you both are wrong and more importantly, the Saints, while undergoing a few pressures, will once again dominate the division.Bwahahahahaha this is classic acceptance of the truth.
Think about it. How bad will it feel if your Falcons can't handle the Saints after this off-season? Huh?
He has accepted it so now he is trying to move on and talk shit at the same time.
Yes Guido you have permission to start another thread about how the Saints are still atop the division. This thread is about the Saints retardedness and their mishaps.
If you don't want to further anger or embarrass yourself then you should probably ignore this thread.
Lmao....I never thought you would get this low Guido. Damn it's sad...
Ah well moving on
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - juraitwaluzka - 06-08-2012 11:23 PM
(06-08-2012 09:08 PM)Jesus Wrote: 62 pages and all I can say is:
FUCK THE SAINTS
Preach on, Preach on!
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - juraitwaluzka - 06-08-2012 11:29 PM
(06-08-2012 09:02 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Well, I guess you both are wrong and more importantly, the Saints, while undergoing a few pressures, will once again dominate the division.
Think about it. How bad will it feel if your Falcons can't handle the Saints after this off-season? Huh?
Don't be a dumbass, ooops too late, NFC South Champions:
2002 Tampa
2003 Carolina
2004 Atlanta
2005 Tampa
2006 Cesspool
2007 Tampa
2008 Carolina
2009 Cesspool
2010 Atlanta
2011 Cesspool
Cess Pool 3
Carolina 3
Tampa 2
Atlanta 2
Yes, quite the domination there. And before you say "oh yeah, well 2 out of the last 3 years", Both Atlanta and Tampa can equal the mark in 1 season, again nothing near domination.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - phocis850 - 06-09-2012 01:17 AM
Goodell makes too much money and is surrounded by too many smart people to just say, "hey, lets have some fun".
When the news broke on what the punishments were, I knew then that Goodell had enough evidence.
Naming 4 players and giving different terms for each isn't something you just make up for fun.
The saints are not holier than thou. They did some bad things and got caught. They deserve to get punished.
By the end of all this, Vilma will be tweeting like a bird.