Atlanta Falcons Talk
NFL: Saints Bounty Thread - Printable Version

+- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com)
+-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards)
+--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More)
+--- Thread: NFL: Saints Bounty Thread (/Thread-NFL-Saints-Bounty-Thread)



RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Radical - 05-21-2012 04:26 PM

(05-21-2012 04:21 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  I said it didn't make sense for him to bring suit if he knew he was guilty and it doesn't.

But it is hardly uncommon. Hell, ask Michael Vick. Ask the steroid nuts in the MLB. I could go on all day.


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 05-21-2012 04:28 PM

(05-21-2012 04:17 PM)pauliwood Wrote:  DUH, its because the Falcons are the perpetrators of this conspiracy against the Saints, Blank made the Commissioner and offer he couldn't refuse. Us as Falcon Fans were all sent a memo regarding this which is why we are not clamming for the truth.

You really live in a fantasy world if you think there are 30 other teams that agree that the Saints are victims.

You, sir, are the one that is in fantasy world. Go around and visit other teams forums. Almost to a team they think the Saints are getting screwed over in this deal. Do it. Check them out.

Look, here is a sports Nation Poll on ESPN:

Whose side are you on in Jonathan Vilma's suspension for his alleged role in the Saints' bounty scandal?


41% Vilma and other players

59% The NFL

(Total votes: 3,585)

That's a pretty solid percentage for EVERYONE thinking that Vilma is guilty.


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 05-21-2012 04:31 PM

(05-21-2012 04:26 PM)Radical Wrote:  But it is hardly uncommon. Hell, ask Michael Vick. Ask the steroid nuts in the MLB. I could go on all day.

Vick didn't sue the commissioner or league, did he? I don't remember a single baseball player suing anyone either. Barry Bonds and Rogers Clemons were both prosecuted for lying to under oath.

It is extremely uncommon and makes no sense if guilty.


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Radical - 05-21-2012 04:32 PM

(05-21-2012 04:31 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  Vick didn't sue the commissioner or league, did he? I don't remember a single baseball player suing anyone either. Barry Bonds and Rogers Clemons were both prosecuted for lying to under oath.

It is extremely uncommon and makes no sense if guilty.

You're picking at the circumstance here. The point is that guilty people fight and deny the system all the time.


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Falconidae - 05-21-2012 04:35 PM

(05-21-2012 04:24 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  I don't think it was a bluff. I think he actually believed based upon something that he thought or heard that they had done it. He believed what someone told him about Vilma. He felt the email from Ornstein verified it. But, I believe someone is lying and it's neither Goodell or Vilma.

Do you really think they spent 3 years and only came up with one email? Or they're relying on one single report?


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Falconidae - 05-21-2012 04:37 PM

(05-21-2012 04:28 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  You, sir, are the one that is in fantasy world. Go around and visit other teams forums. Almost to a team they think the Saints are getting screwed over in this deal. Do it. Check them out.

Look, here is a sports Nation Poll on ESPN:

Whose side are you on in Jonathan Vilma's suspension for his alleged role in the Saints' bounty scandal?


41% Vilma and other players

59% The NFL

(Total votes: 3,585)

That's a pretty solid percentage for EVERYONE thinking that Vilma is guilty.

What? an large majority support the NFL in this poll and you're bringing it up to support your idea that people are upset about how the Saints have been treated?


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - pauliwood - 05-21-2012 04:39 PM

(05-21-2012 04:28 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  You, sir, are the one that is in fantasy world. Go around and visit other teams forums. Almost to a team they think the Saints are getting screwed over in this deal. Do it. Check them out.

Look, here is a sports Nation Poll on ESPN:

Whose side are you on in Jonathan Vilma's suspension for his alleged role in the Saints' bounty scandal?


41% Vilma and other players

59% The NFL

(Total votes: 3,585)

That's a pretty solid percentage for EVERYONE thinking that Vilma is guilty.

Your proof that every one is on your side, is a poll that shows almost 60% of people oppose you.

And you don't see whats wrong with this?
Rolleyes


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 05-21-2012 04:46 PM

(05-21-2012 04:32 PM)Radical Wrote:  You're picking at the circumstance here. The point is that guilty people fight and deny the system all the time.

Yes they do, but they don't file individual lawsuits which would bring out all kinds of bad stuff including the chance for criminal charges if they were guilty. There is a huge difference between getting your day in court and filing a defamation suit.


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - AsylumGuido - 05-21-2012 04:49 PM

(05-21-2012 04:39 PM)pauliwood Wrote:  Your proof that every one is on your side, is a poll that shows almost 60% of people oppose you.

And you don't see whats wrong with this?
Rolleyes

It shows that a large percentage are on Vilma's side. I wish I could see the breakdown, but no fan base I have come across is more committed to the player's guilt that yours. It isn't even close.


RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Beef - 05-21-2012 04:57 PM

LOL. Only 3600 people vote in this dumb poll that shows 60% are against the Saints and this clown thinks that proves 30 other team's fans are supporting the Saints.

So this what it's like watching the delusional go batshit crazy right in front of you. Just wow.