(10-20-2012 02:18 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  Oh, and by the way, Joe Vitt has been very vocal and appeared in court and testified in the restraining order case that there was never any bounty program and no Saints player ever intentionally tried to injure any other player for money or not. Considering he has still yet to be reinstated that took some pretty big balls. But, for some reason I think Goodell was afraid of him.

(10-20-2012 02:46 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  These 2 statements contradict each other. You have no proof, no source, nothing, nada, zilch to support this except for blind faith and hope.

(10-20-2012 02:58 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  Yawn. Okay, let's see if I can find those statements from the players that talked with the coaches before their suspensions took effect. I know at least one of them said they saw one of the letters that Goodell sent the coaches telling them not to comment on the case at all in reference to the reinstatement. This may take awhile. It was back in April I think. Listen, why would I make something up like that? The coaches have many more reasons than that alone to keep quiet right now. But, if you want to hear them talk just wait until this goes to court because you can fully expect everyone of them to testify.

The point is that the coaches have absolutely no leverage in the situation. They have no alternative but to sit back and wait. It is ridiculous to interpret their silence as guilt especially since one of them has already come out very vocally in denial and even testified the fact in court.

Sorry, but you are grasping for non-existent straws there.

(10-20-2012 02:53 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  Oh so he told Vitt not to say anything for reinstatement purposes but because he "scared" of Vitt for some unknown reason, then he is allowed. Lmao.

Do you realize how dumb you sound right now?

This post and my previous 2 posts show how you spin things and are expressing them as facts when, as closely you have followed it, you have no clue.

You were wrong about Cerullo and Williams story not matching AT ALL

You try to spin and express as a fact about the coaches being told not to say anything because you dont know.

Then when you realized that we were going to eventually ask why Vitt wasn't told to shut the fux up because he has been vocal, you tried to spin and express as fact that Goodell is afraid of Vitt.

Just think that for a second or two and think "Well maybe Goodell should have told me to shut the fux up"

(10-20-2012 03:04 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  How am I grasping at straws and how could you of all people call anyone out about that in the 1st place?

I never said they were silent because of their guilt, but I think you are grasping straws at their silence being because of an order.

My boss can't do me wrong and then tell me to keep quiet if I know whats good for me. Thats retarded.

(10-20-2012 02:53 PM)Dale4Saul2Red0 Wrote:  *head shakes*

(10-20-2012 03:13 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  No. You didn't say they were guilty because of that. Dale one the one that said that. He said their silence was proof of guilt. You just expounded on what he was trying to argue.

(10-20-2012 03:28 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  I didn't expound on anything but the fact that you claim Goodell told them to keep quiet in regards to them being reinstated. Somehow Vitt missed that memo but anywho.

Don't assume what I am thinking. I will clearly tell you what I am thinking.