+- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com)
+-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards)
+--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More)
+--- Thread: NFL: Saints Bounty Thread (/Thread-NFL-Saints-Bounty-Thread)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - JDaveG - 09-05-2012 07:04 AM
(09-04-2012 05:12 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: A cartoff was a play with a "legal, clean hit" that resulted in a player leaving the game for at least one play. That is the definition given by Joe Vitt and several other players. If the play resulted in a penalty or was deemed to be an illegal hit the player was fined.
Yes, a player could indeed be injured by a "legal, clean hit", but that is not what the definition of a cartoff entailed. The intent of the pay for performance plan was to reward hard hits, among other key plays, NOT to reward injuries. And the rewards were a mere pittance, anyway.
This is semantics, and it's disingenuous. If the intent is to reward a "legal, clean hit" where someone is "carted off" for at least one play, then the intent is to reward "legal, clean hits" where someone is INJURED.
That you equivocate around this tells me all I need to know about your own honesty and integrity with regard to this issue. The NFL never said the Saints were rewarding illegal hits. They never said the Saints were rewarding dirty play. They said the Saints were rewarding players for causing injuries. That is EXACTLY what you admit to above. You can rationalize around it all you want, but the result and the intent are both the same.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Beef - 09-05-2012 11:16 AM
And Guido troll-post of denial #928347293487293 incoming in 3... 2...
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 09-05-2012 01:04 PM
Yall know when people get carted off that they give the thumbs up to the fans to let them know that everything will be alright. Isn't that ironic it's the Guido seal of approval.
Scenario:
Saints whacks an opponent
Opponent gets carted off after much delay
Opponent gives "thumbs up"
All the Saints players smile and someone on the Saints bench shouts "Give me my money!"
Maybe Guido was a part of the whole thing. It gets deeper. We know Benson was...wasn't he the one that gave Guido's friend cousin auntie baby mama the "thumbs up"
Saints Bounty Thread - juraitwaluzka - 09-05-2012 04:24 PM
Interesting point. I mean whenever a thumbs up is involved it is not something to be taken lightly.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - phocis850 - 09-05-2012 08:52 PM
![[Image: g1346368119613094937.jpg]](http://zipmeme.com/uploads/generated/g1346368119613094937.jpg)
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Peyton - 09-07-2012 03:36 PM
UH, this just in. The players won and Roger Goodell lost.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Peyton - 09-07-2012 03:36 PM
Get ready for the wrath of Guido up in here lol.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - Peyton - 09-07-2012 03:44 PM
Roger Goodell got completely bitchslapped lol.
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - ATLBound - 09-07-2012 03:53 PM
Bwahaha....It's not quite over but they def won the appeals
RE: Saints Bounty Thread - RockHoward - 09-07-2012 04:04 PM
The players successfully bit the hand that feeds them? Good for them! Now they will really get what they deserve.