+- Atlanta Falcons Talk (http://atlantafalconstalk.com)
+-- Forum: Falcons Fans Message Boards (/Forum-Falcons-Fans-Message-Boards)
+--- Forum: Talk About The Falcons & So Much More (/Forum-Talk-About-The-Falcons-So-Much-More)
+--- Thread: Falcons: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD (/Thread-Falcons-Mularkey-is-just-that-and-he-had-nothing-to-do-with-Rodgers-TD)
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011 08:49 PM
(12-15-2011 08:16 PM)cooperbh Wrote: What's an "imbicile?" Is it similar to a "bafoon?"
Seriously, if you're gonna keep on with all the personal insults, at least learn how to spell them correctly.
LOL, so the fact the best you can do is correct spelling, its obvious you realize you're wrong.
Tell ya what, I'll keep misspelling words so you can feel cool for correcting them and you keep talking out your ass so we can all laugh at you behind your back. Deal?
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011 08:58 PM
(12-15-2011 08:25 PM)Peyton Wrote: I agree with Beef about what has happened to the Falcons offense, but I don't agree with the reason it has happened. It's a natural progression for a cerebral QB like Ryan. As a matter of fact, if Ryan wasn't capable of taken on that kind of role, he would be a fairly worthless QB, because he is very average in pretty much every other way.
Sounds to me like Mularkey has designed the ideal offense for Ryan's skillset. Hats off to him for that.
Of course, Beef's Agenda Mob would have you believe that Ryan designs this offense on the fly at the line of scrimmage during games - only when the despotic Mularkey allows him to, that is.
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011 08:59 PM
(12-15-2011 08:25 PM)Peyton Wrote: I agree with Beef about what has happened to the Falcons offense, but I don't agree with the reason it has happened. It's a natural progression for a cerebral QB like Ryan. As a matter of fact, if Ryan wasn't capable of taken on that kind of role, he would be a fairly worthless QB, because he is very average in pretty much every other way.
Not sure how you can't agree with the reason Ryan has taken more control than MM. We're simply playing better when MM isn't calling all the plays. There isn't any other way to interpret that. A 4th year QB shouldn't be better than the veteran OC at managing a game. What might our record be if at the beginning half of the season they were letting Ryan have the level of control he has now instead of MM making as many calls as he did?
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011 09:04 PM
(12-15-2011 08:58 PM)cooperbh Wrote: Sounds to me like Mularkey has designed the ideal offense for Ryan's skillset. Hats off to him for that.
Of course, Beef's Agenda Mob would have you believe that Ryan designs this offense on the fly at the line of scrimmage during games - only when the despotic Mularkey allows him to, that is.
So now you just resort to trolling. You really have no argument when all you do is insist on generalizing purely to antagonize.
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011 09:12 PM
(12-15-2011 08:59 PM)Beef Wrote: Not sure how you can't agree with the reason Ryan has taken more control than MM. We're simply playing better when MM isn't calling all the plays. There isn't any other way to interpret that. A 4th year QB shouldn't be better than the veteran OC at managing a game. What might our record be if at the beginning half of the season they were letting Ryan have the level of control he has now instead of MM making as many calls as he did?
I just disagree that the problems with the offense this year have anything to do with play calling at all, regardless of who is calling them.
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011 09:21 PM
(12-15-2011 09:04 PM)Beef Wrote: So now you just resort to trolling. You really have no argument when all you do is insist on generalizing purely to antagonize.
You're antagonized by the mere fact that there are people in this world who don't hold the exact same opinion as you. Nothing I can do about that.
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Radical - 12-15-2011 09:45 PM
No huddle offense works better than standard play calling?
Unless your QB sucks, there's no reason that shouldn't always be the case.
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-16-2011 12:42 AM
Beef, something you simply do not get: the no huddle always performs better as long as you have the personell to run it and use it when a favorable matchup is on the field.
Specifically, the type of no huddle we run is designed to be methodical and compliment our strong rushing attack.
I am also in the camp that has NO problem with our playcalling. I liked our ball control offense last year and I like things this year; in and out of the no huddle. I am not a GM or coach. I have never understood the "armchair GM" mentality and probably never will. These guys get paid A LOT of money to do their job. I am not ignorant enough to pretend I could do it better.
Furthermore, I am pleased with the progression we have made in incorporating JJ and Quizz while morphing our offense into something new. I had my doubts earlier this season but MM has not failed to utilize our exciting new weapons on offense. Its difficult to change a very successful offense and make it better, I think MM is very close to doing that this season. It helps that our talent on offense is outstanding, especially at QB.
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-16-2011 02:01 AM
38 points. 373 yards. 8.4 yards per pass attempt.
Against the #5 defense in the NFL.
So, how are we spinning that into something negative against Mularkey this week, agendacrats?
RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - illmusic - 12-16-2011 03:48 AM
although I loved the game, their secondary is really banged up, and their offense/special teams gave us 2 gimmes with possessions in the redzone