Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
01-25-2011, 07:48 PM
Post: #71
RE: Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
Dang, anybody know where I can watch every play of every game? I'll settle this argument that way.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-25-2011, 08:05 PM
Post: #72
RE: Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
(01-25-2011 07:48 PM)RFlagg Wrote:  Dang, anybody know where I can watch every play of every game? I'll settle this argument that way.

NFL rewind is good, or record them.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-25-2011, 10:14 PM
Post: #73
RE: Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
(01-25-2011 05:23 PM)cooperbh Wrote:  Maybe the difference was Aaron Rodgers' 76 rushing attempts? I don't know.

What, do you think those rushing attempts were designed run plays executed from running formations?

Aaron Rodgers had 3 designed runs in the first game against Atlanta that I can recall just from the top of my head.

You are way off base on these stats man, way off base.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-25-2011, 10:16 PM
Post: #74
RE: Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
Not only that, but you don't even have the right number of attempts for Rodgers.

He only had 64 rush attempts.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-25-2011, 11:01 PM
Post: #75
RE: Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
(01-25-2011 10:14 PM)Peyton Wrote:  Aaron Rodgers had 3 designed runs in the first game against Atlanta that I can recall just from the top of my head.

You are way off base on these stats man, way off base.

I was referring to plays where he was lined up in the backfield as a RB. Obviously, there were no such plays. The point was that the vast majority of his rushing attempts occurred during scrambles which means those plays were counted as a dropback. Even a designed run play like that QB draw he ran in for a TD in the Falcons game are counted as a dropback.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-25-2011, 11:03 PM
Post: #76
RE: Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
(01-25-2011 11:01 PM)cooperbh Wrote:  I was referring to plays where he was lined up in the backfield as a RB. Obviously, there were no such plays. The point was that the vast majority of his rushing attempts occurred during scrambles which means those plays were counted as a dropback. Even a designed run play like that QB draw he ran in for a TD in the Falcons game are counted as a dropback.

Well...that' interesting. But....we know that wasn't a real dropback.

Either way, designed plays, scrambles, QB sneaks, downing the ball, everything combined...he had 64 rush attempts.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-25-2011, 11:07 PM
Post: #77
RE: Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
(01-25-2011 10:16 PM)Peyton Wrote:  Not only that, but you don't even have the right number of attempts for Rodgers.

He only had 64 rush attempts.

Plus 12 more in the postseason. When Swift said 70+, I assumed he was referring to the regular season only since that's what our conversation had been centered around up until that point. Hence, I never bothered to check and see if that 76 number was regular season only or not.

That was my fault for trusting Swift to have accurate information. I should have known better.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-25-2011, 11:18 PM
Post: #78
RE: Why Matt Ryan and Mularky are more the problem then oline!
(01-25-2011 11:03 PM)Peyton Wrote:  Well...that' interesting. But....we know that wasn't a real dropback.

Well, PFF counted it as a dropback, so I have to roll with that. Sneaks and kneel downs are the only QB plays they don't count as a dropback.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply