Which is the biggest problem with our offense?

[Swift Is a Die Hard]

Do we need a play maker ...yess

but we have solid franchise QB .. a top tier rb , top tier wr , a HOF te ( yet declining ) but still one of better TES in game....


this is perfect example of why offensive philosophy and Mularkey scheme leave a lot to be desired. .The scheme only can do so much . I think we have maxed out the talent / offensive system + scheme. I dont see any spike in any of our players numbers..

Roddy .- hit his mark...Dont think he will match this kind of numbers
Ryan- great season I cant picture Ryan having a better year under this system .
Ryan threw for 28tds 3700 yards and kept his ints down ..His YPA leaves something to be desired but still a very good season
Turner - carries sooner or later will start see wear and tear


We missing that speed back / and slot wr that can rack up yac but I dont see these numbers drastically increasing .

[TonyGraziani]

(02-04-2011 02:53 PM)cooperbh Wrote:  Remind me again why the subject of our mediocre offensive line has no place in a discussion about our mediocre offense?

Because that is something that EVERYBODY who has a problem with our offense agrees with. I haven't heard a soul say our OL is just fine. There has been much more difference of opinion when it comes to the issue of Mularkey vs. our roster, which is the subject of this thread.

[pauliwood]

option 3: highly irrational fan base that turns on its team with the tenacity of a pit bull

[TonyGraziani]

(02-04-2011 03:59 PM)pauliwood Wrote:  option 3: highly irrational fan base that turns on its team with the tenacity of a pit bull

Bro, look back to the night we played the Pack. I was pretty much the only one still saying we would pull it out after halftime. This team was every bit as good as that 13-3 record we earned. I ride or die for this team. But to say we don't have things to address in order to take that next step is, to use your word, irrational. JMHO.

[phalcon phil]

(02-03-2011 11:10 PM)Peyton Wrote:  First of all, I don't know that it is fair to say there is a "problem" when the team scored so many points.

But..if there is a weakness, I definitely think it is in the talent area, not the coaching area. I don't really care that half the offense made the Pro Bowl.

The bigger concern on the offense is the fact that they are starting to be a pretty old bunch too.

Our offense was NOWHERE near as good as it was ranked statistically. If you looked at the numbers and watched the games you would be scratching your head. To people who aren't absolute homers, you had to notice how horribly ineffective and inconsistent our offense was at times. Our record could have just as easily been 8-8. Several of us had concerns about the offense BEFORE the season started. I'm just glad the front office finally pulled their head out of the sand and admitted what many of us have known since the season started. We need better players on offense. This is why I'm one of the few folks who was not a bit surprised at our loss in the playoffs. Not one bit.

[phalcon phil]

I'm not a fan of the scheme either btw.

[Jayhawk-Falcon2012]

Maybe the problem is more that we aren't "explosive". If Jenks can change it like 180 and be a playmaker that helps the entire offense ten fold. Seriously most of what we all have been reading/writing is that Jenks hasn't been that cog thats kept our offense as big-play as everyone wants. Doesn't help that turner doesn't do much to contribute to the passing game, but again. If jenks can actually be a bigger threat instead of the guy that every once and awhile makes a "big" catch then we could be considered a bigger threat on Offense.

It'd be nice to have a CoP back but thats why this off-season, hopefully, we pick that guy up.

I'm sure with some of those minor tweaks we'd be perfectly fine.

OL as of now I'm kind of on the fence. They weren't terrible, but they weren't anything we can brag about either.

Those are my thoughts.

*edit*

I guess the word i'm looking for is consistency with the big-play/explosiveness