|
We could possibly have two guys with 100+ tackles
|
|
09-15-2010, 08:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
We could possibly have two guys with 100+ tackles
Spoon and Lofton are tackling machines and I can easily see them both getting to that mark.
Lets just hope we dont have another 100+ tackler in the secondary.
|
|||
|
09-15-2010, 08:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: We could possibly have two guys with 100+ tackles
If we could ever get this offense off the ground - we might be lucky and have 2 20 tackle LB because they'll only see the field 15 minutes a game.
![]()
|
|||
|
09-15-2010, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: We could possibly have two guys with 100+ tackles
(09-15-2010 08:45 PM)Tandy Wrote: If we could ever get this offense off the ground - we might be lucky and have 2 20 tackle LB because they'll only see the field 15 minutes a game. That would be something to be proud of.
|
|||
|
09-15-2010, 09:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: We could possibly have two guys with 100+ tackles
(09-15-2010 08:45 PM)Tandy Wrote: If we could ever get this offense off the ground - we might be lucky and have 2 20 tackle LB because they'll only see the field 15 minutes a game. What she said. If you have two players over 100 solo tackles, probably means your defense is staying on the field too much. |
|||
|
09-15-2010, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: We could possibly have two guys with 100+ tackles
(09-15-2010 08:45 PM)Tandy Wrote: If we could ever get this offense off the ground - we might be lucky and have 2 20 tackle LB because they'll only see the field 15 minutes a game. I like this idea MUCH better!
|
|||
|
09-15-2010, 09:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: We could possibly have two guys with 100+ tackles
Yeah, that's the problem... you need stats to get attention (and Pro Bowl invites), yet if you are a good team, you should not get the opportunities to rack up huge numbers. It's a conundrum that has cost many a career accolade.
Formerly SBC Falcon
|
|||
|
09-15-2010, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: We could possibly have two guys with 100+ tackles
Lofton for sure, i say Spoon gets about 80..
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|





![[Image: 1284503062.gif]](http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/1336/1284503062.gif)