That was a disco move, not a football move....

[AsylumGuido]

(12-31-2010 08:30 PM)Beef Wrote:  No, it does NOT say that one of the penalties "didn't even happen", what part of the 2 freaking penalties cancelling each other out do you not MF'ing understand?

O-PI & D-PI cancel each other out. It's pretty gawd damned simple. What's left is what actually happened then. In this case it was a WR catch & offensive gain. However, if it were a defensive interception, then so be it as well. The end result is therefore not an artificial advantage for one side & a huge loss for the other.

The way the rule is setup now, even though the penalties "offset", one side benefits & the other side loses. Which, by definition & pure logic, means it's not fair or equal in any realm of possibility. I can't freaking believe you can't grasp this.

What kills me is that there's 100% proof positive of what I'm saying. The play in question is my evidence for shit sakes. 2 offsetting penalties, yet one side still got screwed & the other benefitted significantly. And you're flat out not going to convince anyone that this is equal punishment, because it's overwhelmingly obvious it's not.

There we go. I hope you do well in the future. You just demonstrated the total lack of reason. I spelled out every scenario you presented and you fail to comprehend. Once again, I wish you well in the future. Personally, that is. I do hope for your sake that your team loses.