|
Standings nfc South
|
|
09-27-2010, 12:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Standings nfc South
(09-27-2010 12:05 PM)phocis850 Wrote: I don't see how Tampa is 3rd in the division. TB has no losses in the NFC. Because Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005.
|
|||
|
09-27-2010, 03:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Standings nfc South
NFL Site has it ATL, TB, NO, CAR
|
|||
|
09-27-2010, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Standings nfc South
(09-27-2010 12:05 PM)phocis850 Wrote: Tandy, see what I mean? I don't see how Tampa is 3rd in the division. TB has no losses in the NFC. I agree - I'll have to try to find out how the standings are ranked. ![]()
|
|||
|
09-27-2010, 03:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Standings nfc South
(09-27-2010 06:02 AM)falcon057 Wrote: I couldn't help myself A beautiful sight indeed. |
|||
|
09-27-2010, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Standings nfc South
This is what I found about Division standings - The tie breakers between 2 teams within the same division - in this order:
Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs). Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference. Strength of victory. Strength of schedule. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed. Best net points in common games. Best net points in all games. Best net touchdowns in all games. Coin toss ![]()
|
|||
|
09-27-2010, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Standings nfc South
Those standings are wrong. The Bucs have a Division Win. The Saints do not. The Bucs should be #2.
|
|||
|
09-27-2010, 06:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-27-2010 06:26 PM by AtlantaFalconPokerPro.)
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Standings nfc South
(09-27-2010 12:23 PM)evo Wrote: Because Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005. ![]() (09-27-2010 05:59 PM)The Falcon Jedi Wrote: Those standings are wrong. The Bucs have a Division Win. The Saints do not. The Bucs should be #2. I'm not sure where he got his standings, but TB is in 2nd... ![]() Isn't this a pretty sight...
|
|||
|
09-27-2010, 06:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-27-2010 06:26 PM by JKH5785.)
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Standings nfc South
(09-27-2010 10:28 AM)phocis850 Wrote: How is NO above TB? Because they've played two NFC teams, but Tampa did beat Carolina which should make them second. Dome Section 232! |
|||
|
09-27-2010, 06:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Standings nfc South | |||
|
09-27-2010, 06:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Standings nfc South | |||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|





![[Image: 1284503062.gif]](http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/1336/1284503062.gif)


![[Image: pinto.gif]](http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii40/candy_cherry_theater/spread%20the%20gif%20love/pinto.gif)
![[Image: xxxz.png]](http://i934.photobucket.com/albums/ad181/MitchIngram/xxxz.png)