Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Say the 2nd INT by Grimes was also over ruled...
12-08-2010, 12:32 AM
Post: #11
RE: Say the 2nd INT by Grimes was also over ruled...
(12-07-2010 11:57 PM)Jesus Wrote:  He just would have picked the next pass.


hahahahha greatest post ever Big Grin

and thanks guys yeah I didn't think it would just dissappear
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2010, 01:53 AM (This post was last modified: 12-08-2010 01:53 AM by NOVAFalconFan.)
Post: #12
RE: Say the 2nd INT by Grimes was also over ruled...
Grimes would have gotten so mad he would have jumped over the pirate ship and punched the first Bucs fan he ran across outside in the face. That would be a league fine for sure.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2010, 02:03 AM
Post: #13
RE: Say the 2nd INT by Grimes was also over ruled...
(12-07-2010 11:54 PM)evo Wrote:  It showed during the replay that Grime stepped outside, then Freeman came charge in.

I think it should've been a Helmet to Helmet more than a late hit.

Not to take Freeman side, but the Ref call that hit on Grime as a late hit was "kinda BS" Because if Freeman wasnt going to hit Grimes, Grimes would've had kept on running. It pretty much similar to the one Beerman laid on Freeman (so if we take Beerman side, to be fair we have to take Freeman side on the hit as well) They both was running full force into the other player and put on a football tackel.

It just that the one Freeman laid on Grime was straight up helmet to helmet. If any penalty should've been call on Freeman during the play, it should have been Personal Foul - Helmet to Helmet. Still 15 yard penalty, same shit. Tongue

Biermann's hit was late, and thus deserved the penalty.

Grimes had already stepped out clearly and Josh went OOBs to hit him, and drilled him full speed. It was clearly a late hit out of bounds, as you could see from the sideline field level camera angle.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply