Our offense now resembles Green Bay and New Orleans.

[mdrake34]

Think about it. Last year with Meier's injury and HD83's regression, we were forced to run a very conservative 2 TE offense most of the time.

Now, we can have on the field on any given play Roddy, Jones, Jenkins, HD, and Meier/Weems. I like the idea of that. Alot.

[Swift Is a Die Hard]

Not even close . saints / packers use spread offense

With Mularkey we will still be run oriented offense , we just run some more play action and stretch defense . If Jones can get down field open up the box

[mdrake34]

(04-28-2011 09:04 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  Not even close . saints / packers use spread offense

With Mularkey we will still be run oriented offense , we just run some more play action and stretch defense . If Jones can get down field open up the box

Swift . . . Am I going to pass the Bar? How much money am I going to make in 5 years? When will I get married?

I was just wondering if you could tell me the answer to any of those questions, since you obviously have a crystal ball can see exactly how our offense will run next year.

[ggp]

(04-28-2011 09:04 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  Not even close . saints / packers use spread offense

With Mularkey we will still be run oriented offense , we just run some more play action and stretch defense . If Jones can get down field open up the box

It will be more than that. Ryan has the mind to run a complex offense. With the addition of a developmental LT (Willie Smith) and an undervalued RB (Graig Cooper), we will have a very dangerous offense.

Watch free agency. I think we will fill needs quickly.

[Swift Is a Die Hard]

I hope you Pass the bar mdrake cause then all that schooling will go to waste .

I'm just trying to pass some football knowledge down to you mdrake our offense won't look like Saints/ Packers cause they have pass heavy spread formations . Mularkey is not changing his scheme

[cnasty]

(04-28-2011 09:04 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  Not even close . saints / packers use spread offense

With Mularkey we will still be run oriented offense , we just run some more play action and stretch defense . If Jones can get down field open up the box

We didn't just blow our wad on an explosive WR to stay with a 2 TE, run oriented offense. We now have the personnel to run a GB/NO type offense. Shit just got real interesting for ATL. We haven't had the people to do it before, now there is literally no excuse left...

[mdrake34]

(04-28-2011 09:09 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  I hope you Pass the bar mdrake cause then all that schooling will go to waste .

I'm just trying to pass some football knowledge down to you mdrake our offense won't look like Saints/ Packers cause they have pass heavy spread formations . Mularkey is not changing his scheme

So what would it have looked like had we drafted Dez Bryant? Hmm?

[DemBirds]

(04-28-2011 09:09 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  I hope you Pass the bar mdrake cause then all that schooling will go to waste .

I'm just trying to pass some football knowledge down to you mdrake our offense won't look like Saints/ Packers cause they have pass heavy spread formations . Mularkey is not changing his scheme

Mularkey has always worked with what he's had. In Pittsburgh he ran trick plays because he had the players to do so. Here he's run conservative 2 TE sets because he lacked the players to do otherwise.

[Swift Is a Die Hard]

(04-28-2011 09:12 PM)mdrake34 Wrote:  So what would it have looked like had we drafted Dez Bryant? Hmm?

If we drafted Dez we wouldn't be missing all these picks. Some players might be missing diamond jewlery though lol

[mdrake34]

(04-28-2011 09:15 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  If we drafted Dez we wouldn't be missing all these picks. Some players might be missing diamond jewlery though lol

Do you not agree that if Mularkey had Dez last year, as he now has Jones now, he wouldn't have called the offense differently?