Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Beef · 02-08-2013, 02:27 PM

(02-04-2013 03:00 AM)Xanthri Wrote: not sure what you mean? we don't have a high enough draft pick to go after a DE....we have to find that diamond in the rough....the one thing about OSI is a lot of people compare massoqou (spelled wrong)...perhaps bringing in Osi for a year or two he could mentor the young man into a superstar.....hell....he might be able to help a few of our guys out.....

Our draft pick position is best for shoring up the O-line or TE position (and no I am not saying I want them to do that - but that is the BEST value we will get at 30 unless someone falls) We have to pick up DE talent in an aging guy who still has gas and wants to play for contender....or a project guy who gets released that we see potential in.....or TD needs to find that guy who no one else sees......who is worth a 1st round....

I would be happy with trading down and getting another 2nd and third...

Anyone who thinks we're picking a TE or OL with our first pick at 30 and is claiming there won't be any good DL's left doesn't have a good grasp on this draft class at all.

Mel Kiper, the MF'ing KING of getting it wrong, has us picking Eifert at 30, for instance. That idiot couldn't get a pick right if the team told him ahead of time what position they were drafting.

Dave Archer laughs every time someone calling in tells them we need to pick a TE at 30.

There's 6 or 7 very good DE's and 6 or 7 very good DT's in this draft. Not only will 3 or 4 of each still be there at 30, but several of them will still be there at our second round pick at 60. On top of that, even if we don't go DL with pick 30, we'd certainly go RB before TE or OL as well.

Priority 1a and 1b are pass rush and running game. Period. And then priority 2 is stopping the run. OL and TE are the least of our priorities, actually.