NFL: WhoDats on Saintsreport going ape shit

[AsylumGuido]

(06-13-2012 05:32 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  So it is of no significance to you that he failed to produce a winning record against bottom dwellers in the league without Payton standing beside him?

That doesn't mean anything at all? If you don't think Payton wasn't involved in calling plays at all during that timeframe, then you are being EXTREMELY naive and only for the benefit of trying to win a forum debate. Reality will settle in during the bye week and beyond.

It's sad because there are plenty on this forum who can admit that most likely Brees will sign, and the Saints are a formidable opponent, and Brees is a great QB. We have fans who are not so delusional to recognize things that sre against us but still great. But for you it's difficult to get a common and real answer out of you about the absence of Payton. At one point Payton's absence will not affect the offense and then at another point Payton's absence will cost you 2 games (14 to 12). And at one point Spags will run the whole defense. So if Spags runs the whole defense with no input from Payton and your offense won't be affected by Payton's absence...them why will Payton's absence reduce your game win total from 14 to 12.

Oh wait I forgot...Payton is soooo important to the Special Teams play. Duh...what the fuck was I thinking?

Yes, reality will set in bye week and beyond. The Saints should be 4-1 at that point with two weeks to prepare for a overrated Tampa team. After that game Vitt will be back and the Saints should continue to roll.

Oh, and I said I felt the Saints could win AT LEAST 12 under the current circumstances. With all of Payton's preparation for this season it could be more. Maybe even 14. But, if were not available the following season I would be a different story.