Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NFL Tampa Bay Bucaneers
05-18-2012, 07:52 PM
Post: #11
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-18-2012 07:50 PM)ChrisD Wrote:  I can say the same about both the Falcons and threw Saints that year almost. I mean with a few of their wins.

Imo there are only 2.or 3 truly shit teams right more. Browns, Jaguars, Raiders (as.much as they always show flashes ov promise..)
Maybe you could put the Colts on thee but last year imo was an anomolly. (did I spell that right?)

Point being since I would say the 2007 or 2008 season, the entire NFL has grown a lot more even. Its hard to say any wins are easy to get anymore. Omitting blowouts of course.

I think that this year we will see a little bit more of the 2010 Bucs. They'll put up a respectable 9-7 imo.

I respectfully disagree and say that six wins is likely and seven would mean that the Falcons lost one to them because the Saints won't.

Wink

Saints Fan Since 1967
[Image: GuidoSig-vi.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-19-2012, 11:09 AM
Post: #12
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-18-2012 07:52 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  I respectfully disagree and say that six wins is likely and seven would mean that the Falcons lost one to them because the Saints won't.

Wink

Eh, We do play them week 17, so they might have an outside chance in a meaningless game vs. our B squad.

[Image: katyperrysnlgif.gif][Image: wtf-girl-photo-booty-rub1.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-19-2012, 11:10 AM
Post: #13
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
Didn't think much of the the Bucs last year, and don't think much of them this year either.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-20-2012, 05:29 PM
Post: #14
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-18-2012 01:53 PM)cnasty Wrote:  Let's also remember that a lot of those wins were against shit teams.

Yeah, they did beat the Saints.

[Image: tumblr_lu9kv4nsVs1r5z4sho1_500.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-20-2012, 05:59 PM
Post: #15
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-20-2012 05:29 PM)DemBirds Wrote:  Yeah, they did beat the Saints.

Yes, that is true. More than you can say about the Falcons.

Angel

Saints Fan Since 1967
[Image: GuidoSig-vi.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-20-2012, 06:26 PM
Post: #16
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-20-2012 05:59 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  Yes, that is true. More than you can say about the Falcons.

Angel

I'm referring to 2010, so actually the Falcons did beat the Saints.

[Image: tumblr_lu9kv4nsVs1r5z4sho1_500.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-20-2012, 06:27 PM
Post: #17
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-20-2012 06:26 PM)DemBirds Wrote:  I'm referring to 2010, so actually the Falcons did beat the Saints.
Angel

Fixed it for ya.

[Image: katyperrysnlgif.gif][Image: wtf-girl-photo-booty-rub1.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-20-2012, 06:56 PM
Post: #18
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-20-2012 06:26 PM)DemBirds Wrote:  I'm referring to 2010, so actually the Falcons did beat the Saints.

Ah, yes, 2010. Most of the starters sat out the game and the rest didn't finish.

Saints Fan Since 1967
[Image: GuidoSig-vi.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-20-2012, 07:34 PM
Post: #19
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-20-2012 06:56 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  Ah, yes, 2010. Most of the starters sat out the game and the rest didn't finish.

I guess you're talking about the Bucs....
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-21-2012, 10:58 AM
Post: #20
RE: Tampa Bay Bucaneers
(05-20-2012 07:34 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  I guess you're talking about the Bucs....

Yup. That was the final game back in 2010. The Saints were locked into the #5 seed and the outcome of the game meant nothing.

Saints Fan Since 1967
[Image: GuidoSig-vi.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply