|
NFL Saints Bounty Thread
|
|
06-18-2012, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(06-17-2012 11:45 PM)RFlagg Wrote: No. I am just part of the growing tide that believes the Saints have been totally railroaded by Goodell and that he has terribly underestimated his power over the players. The coaches and front office were threatened to keep their mouths shut when he suspended them. He has discovered that the players are going to take the bogus punishment lying down. Saints Fan Since 1967
|
|||
|
06-18-2012, 01:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(06-17-2012 04:04 PM)ATLBound Wrote: Sad things is they are trying to deny Shanle's admittance of it. He admitted to it. All he said was that it wasn't as bad as the NFL is making it out to be but Shanle admitted to the cartoffs and confirmed the contents of the ledger Shanle did not admit to anything about a bounty on opposing players. THAT is what they were accused of. They were accused of INTENTIONALLY injuring opponents for pay. Shanle admitted to a pay for performance program and said that Gregg Williams used terms like whacks and cartoffs referring to legal hard hits. That is not a bounty as Goodell described to the press. The supposed ledger, which wasn't used as evidence at the appeal sham today, does not support the existence of bounties or intentional injuries to opponents. Saints Fan Since 1967
|
|||
|
06-18-2012, 01:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(06-17-2012 12:30 AM)hitwriter Wrote: The post punishment/suspension evidence would be included/presented in the appeal process and must from what I understand therefore be shared. It was shared, although not by the 72 hour deadline prior to the appeal as the CBA demands. Reports are that it included the Shanle article, the Pamphilon tape and a power point of quotes from Gregg Williams. Reportedly, it did not contain any evidence whatsoever supporting the claim of a bounty program. Saints Fan Since 1967
|
|||
|
06-18-2012, 02:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(06-18-2012 01:56 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: It was shared, although not by the 72 hour deadline prior to the appeal as the CBA demands. Reports are that it included the Shanle article, the Pamphilon tape and a power point of quotes from Gregg Williams. Reportedly, it did not contain any evidence whatsoever supporting the claim of a bounty program. The CBA calls for 3 calendar days not 72 hours. Vilma's lawyer is trying to twist the timeline. If the NFL provided any criteria anytime Friday the 15th that would satisfy the 3 calendar days. I love the Falcons and to hell with anyone who doesn't! |
|||
|
06-18-2012, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
You know what's awesome. I don't care what happens to the Saints.
I don't care if they are guilty or not. I'm just surprised that you haven't learned anything yet Guido. You don't know a damn thing. Nor do we or anyone else. That's how it goes. Deal with it when we DO know something. Don't blurt out facts saying this and that until all the evidence is presented. Until then its all just speculation and opinion.
|
|||
|
06-18-2012, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(06-18-2012 01:52 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Shanle did not admit to anything about a bounty on opposing players. THAT is what they were accused of. They were accused of INTENTIONALLY injuring opponents for pay. Shanle admitted to a pay for performance program and said that Gregg Williams used terms like whacks and cartoffs referring to legal hard hits. That is not a bounty as Goodell described to the press. The supposed ledger, which wasn't used as evidence at the appeal sham today, does not support the existence of bounties or intentional injuries to opponents. Shanle said if the legal hits lead to an injury then they still got paid for it, which means they got paid for injuries. The intent doesn't matter. This falls in line with why Shanle said it wasn't as bad as the NFL was making it out to be. |
|||
|
06-18-2012, 05:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(06-18-2012 01:52 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Gregg Williams used terms like whacks and cartoffs referring to legal hard hits.
|
|||
|
06-18-2012, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/...4297885696
Quote:@SI_PeterKing https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/...9946088449 Quote:@SI_PeterKing https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/...7675947009 Quote:@SI_PeterKing
|
|||
|
06-18-2012, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(06-18-2012 05:39 PM)Anomaly Wrote: https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/...4297885696Let the denial resume. :/ |
|||
|
06-18-2012, 05:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-18-2012 06:03 PM by Anomaly.)
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
https://twitter.com/realfreemancbs/statu...9359564800
Quote:@realfreemancbs https://twitter.com/realfreemancbs/statu...7051352064 Quote:@realfreemancbs https://twitter.com/realfreemancbs/statu...4113124353 Quote:@realfreemancbs https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/...9728969728 Quote: @AdamSchefter
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|



![[Image: eocz3.gif]](http://i.imgur.com/eocz3.gif)

