NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[AsylumGuido]

(06-08-2012 07:11 PM)JDaveG Wrote:  "Sinister?" Depends on what you mean by that.

I think the Saints organization is run by a bunch of first class assholes who think the rules don't apply to them and kept running a pay for performance program that included specific payments for injuring opposing players even after they were asked by the league to stop. So that hasn't changed. But I don't know what you think I thought before, so it's hard to comment on the version of "what I believed from the start" that you think existed.

I know the league came to them after the 2010 playoffs and said that they were accused of placing a bounty on a Viking player. They found no evidence of it happening, but told the Saints not to undertake this practice in the future. If you research back it had nothing to do with a pay for performance program back then. It was all based upon a claim of a bounty on a Viking player.

Well, if they never placed a bounty on a player they complied with the demand, right?