NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[ATLBound]

(06-03-2012 07:58 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  To date there has been no evidence of a targeting of opposing players for pay.

That is what the whole thing is about. Don't you get it?

It's funny that you keep going to the "targeting opposing players" line. Here's a nice little paragraph for you and ocne again you have YET to answer the questions I asked earlier. So let's try this again:

Yahoo first reported that the NFL has the ledger, which describes $1,000 payments for ''cart-offs,'' or hits which left opponents needing help to the sideline. It noted $400 payments for ''whacks,'' or hard hits, and $100 deductions for mental errors.

Now I ask AGAIN

What is a cart-off?

What is a "hit which left opponents needing help to the sideline?"

What is a $1000?

What does it mean when the ledger advises that they were intending to pay $1000 for cart-offs or a hit which left opponents needing help to the sideline?"

From my understanding it shows EVIDENCE of a pay to injure program. It doesn't matter if the hit was legal. It doesn't matter if it never happens. It doesn't matter if a particular player on that team wasn't targeted. THIS EVIDENCE COMPLETELY SHOWS A PAY TO INJURE PROGRAM. We're not discussing the targets for specific players. That evidence has yet to come out. We are talking about this ledger and how it proves a pay for injure program. Whether you choose to believe the evidence is another story and your own personal right, but this is evidence that people were asking for.

I await your response although I know now that you will not answer questions that you can't spin.

What you're mistaken is that this whole thing is only about targeting specific players. NOOOOOO. It's about a program that consists of pay for performance AND pay for injure. Period. Now don't you get it?