|
NFL Saints Bounty Thread
|
|
06-04-2012, 12:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-04-2012 12:36 AM by ATLBound.)
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(06-03-2012 07:58 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: To date there has been no evidence of a targeting of opposing players for pay. It's funny that you keep going to the "targeting opposing players" line. Here's a nice little paragraph for you and ocne again you have YET to answer the questions I asked earlier. So let's try this again: Yahoo first reported that the NFL has the ledger, which describes $1,000 payments for ''cart-offs,'' or hits which left opponents needing help to the sideline. It noted $400 payments for ''whacks,'' or hard hits, and $100 deductions for mental errors. Now I ask AGAIN What is a cart-off? What is a "hit which left opponents needing help to the sideline?" What is a $1000? What does it mean when the ledger advises that they were intending to pay $1000 for cart-offs or a hit which left opponents needing help to the sideline?" From my understanding it shows EVIDENCE of a pay to injure program. It doesn't matter if the hit was legal. It doesn't matter if it never happens. It doesn't matter if a particular player on that team wasn't targeted. THIS EVIDENCE COMPLETELY SHOWS A PAY TO INJURE PROGRAM. We're not discussing the targets for specific players. That evidence has yet to come out. We are talking about this ledger and how it proves a pay for injure program. Whether you choose to believe the evidence is another story and your own personal right, but this is evidence that people were asking for. I await your response although I know now that you will not answer questions that you can't spin. What you're mistaken is that this whole thing is only about targeting specific players. NOOOOOO. It's about a program that consists of pay for performance AND pay for injure. Period. Now don't you get it?
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|



