NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[ATLBound]

(06-03-2012 12:25 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  How do you explain the total lack of validity of the supposed ledger?

It didn't correspond to the Buffalo game as originally reported. It doesn't correspond to the Carolina game that was reported after the retraction of the original story.

Please explain that!

Also, this is from the ESPN story on the supposed ledger:

"The NFL has not discussed the ledger in any of its official reports or public comments, but the document's existence appears to support the league's contention that the Saints operated an improper pay-for-performance program. Whether it confirms that actual bounties were placed on targeted opponents is not yet clear, as the document has not been made public."

Note the key phrase "actual bounties ... placed on targeted opponents". That is the crux of the penalties laid down on the players and staff. If it was just the pay for performance part it would never have gotten so big.

How do you conveniently bold the part that "helps" your delusions, but misread the WHOLE statement? It also says beyond the bolded part that the document has not been made public yet or did you forget to read that part?

Focus clearly and make sure you read it twice to understand. I'm not talking about pay for performance right now. I'm talking specifically pay for inuries, cart-offs, etc. Basically anything related to getting PAID because a clean hit causes an injury. THAT's the key thing here.

They are already PAID to do their job and play football, BUT they are PAID EXTRA for cart-offs even if it's a clean hit. THAT IS A BOUNTY.

How hard is this to understand. Drathdon realizes it because he is basically saying the same thing that I'm saying.

Also this is a story that Yahoo leaked, not the NFL, not the Goodell. So if oarts of their story is miscommunicated or false, then that doesn't have any weight on Goodell's case.

Keeping trying Guido. What excuse do you have next?