NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[AsylumGuido]

(05-16-2012 05:23 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  I think there is still a problem with reading comprehension.

The difference between Mary Jo White and Payton's lawyer is that...read carefully from here....

Payton's lawyer is PAID TO REPRESENT PAYTON

Mary Jo White is PAID TO CONSULT THE NFL. She does not represent the NFL. So when she puts a statwment out it is on her behalf and her employer.

When Payton's lawyer puts his statement out it is to represent his client Payton and since his paid by Payton to represent him, then it is his job to defend him at all costs.

Mary Jo white is not the NFL's lawyer. It has been said thay the NFL has called on Mary Jo white in other cases so for her future it is more beneficial for her to tell the absolute truth as a consultant because if the NFL depends on her to provide them with the right feedback in regards to this case and as a result there is a negative impact then the NFL will be reluctant to use her the next time.

Read it 7 times if you have so that you may get the picture. This is not to say that Payton's lawyers are lieing but it is to show that Mary would have NO benefit from lieing. Please tell me you ubderstand this. It's very simple.

We agree on this, then. I don't believe that White lied. You can tell the truth without telling the whole truth. I only brought up White as an example of why no lawyer would blatantly lie like Beef is claiming Payton's lawyer is lying.

Do you not agree that it is most probable that Payton did indeed say he had never read that email before in the interview?

Do you also not agree that he probably also said that the bounty referenced what was an ongoing joke?

I'm asking this of you, ATLBound, because I know Beef would refuse to be open minded enough to agree.