|
NFL Saints Bounty Thread
|
|
05-12-2012, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(05-12-2012 04:41 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote: I don't care about any of that. The issue on the table right now is player punishment and the document gives absolutely no proof, as Goodell and White claimed, that players engaged in donating and collecting money directly related to injury. It also did not state that Hargrove admitted to participating himself. Of course you conveniently "don't care about any of that", because it DOES prove a bounty program existed and players such as Hargove and coaches were involved in it. You don't get to dismiss this like it doesn't matter simply because you see now that it's indefensible logic that proves you're wrong. You keep saying it doesn't prove anything, but you don't follow it up with any rational logic that can answer every question. No, it is NOT plausible that this was simply getting on the same page about pay for performance. If it were supposed to be about pay for performance and not bounties, Vitt wouldn't be claiming that Hargove is lying about the entire declaration. And more than that, Hargove got suspended for participating in "pay for injury bounties", not "pay for performance rewards". Why would Hargove try to pass blame in an attempt to lessen his punishment with a declaration that has nothing to do with what he was punished for? NFL: We're suspending you for your participation in pay for injury bounties. Hargrove: But Williams and Vitt told me to deny, play dumb, and stay on the same page about pay for performance rewards! NFL: So? What's that got to do with why we're suspending you? You see, the declaration's existence ONLY makes sense if it's about injury bounties, lying, and a cover-up. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|



