NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[ATLBound]

(05-11-2012 01:20 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  

I was the one that said clearly. What I meant was that it is clear that it does not acknowledge any of those things. White stated on record that the declaration "acknowledged the nature of the program". It does not. It doesn't go into the nature of the program AT ALL. All it does is talk about denying it exists.

White also stated on record that it "acknowledged his participation in it". It does not at all. Go back and read it closely and copy and paste here the exact text that acknowledges his participation. You can't because it isn't there.

White also stated, once again on record, that it "acknowledged that he was told to lie". It does not at all. Once again, show me the exact text that proves that he was told to lie.

Your fellow member Falconidae acknowledges all of this.

You act as though you think I'm the only one who has this opinion. It is now widely excepted in the media that the declaration "clearly" does not relay what Goodell and White claimed that it relayed prior to its appearance in full public view.

You can't defend this. It is right there in black and white. Or rather, it ISN'T there in black and white.

That's your problem and anybody else who agrees. You're looking at in Black and White when it isn't like that with Mary Jo White.

This is why I said earlier that you have to understand what Mary Jo White's profession is/was. She was a former federal prosecutor. She was hired by the NFl to act in that role.

To help you out here's a little dialogue:

NFL: Hi Mrs. White here is a declaration. With this declaration, can you use this as evidence in court to make a jury believe that a bounty existed, the author of this declaration was involved in it, and that the author of this declaration was advised to be dishonest about it?

Mary Jo White: *Reads the document* Yes I can do this, ask this question, say this word to make a jury believe in a court of law that all those 3 things are true.

This is what I was talking about and what Beef was eluding to. To understand what I am talking about, then you have to take YOUR mind from the situation and place it in the mind of Mrs. White and how she would think. Understand this declaration and what it says or doesn't say is under normal circumstances under a debate from me to you. It is evidence and evidence has and will always be for years used, flipped, tossed, and spun around to make what you say seem true and to make what the other person says false.

Please tell me that you see where I am going with this. I can not make it any more clear.