NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[AsylumGuido]

(05-11-2012 12:51 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  It doesn't say "clearly"

It says it acknowledges the existence of a bounty

It says it acknowledges Hargrove's participation in it

It says it acknowledges Hargrove was told to lie about it.

The word "clearly" was never established. This is very important because if using logic, then yes what Mrs. White said was correct.

It acknowledges the existence because why would someone be called in tp deny or play dumb to something that doesn't exist.

It acknowledges his participation in it because the NFL and Saints coaches called in Hargrove specifically about the interview and to play sumb about it.

It acknowledges that he was told to fabricate it because he was told to play dumb about it. That is the equivalent of a half truth or in essence a lie.

Once again you are missing the point because Mrs. White never said "clearly" from what I have seen. Understand Mrs. White is a former prosecutor so when she acknowledges what this declaration could mean she is indicating that if we were to take this evidence into a court of law then we could use this as proof of these 3 things.

That's where you are failing and yet you are still trying to make it seem as if Mrs. White is going to forego her reputation at a prestigious law firm to help the NFL. You're trying every angle to make yourself and the Saints seem right and it's pitiful. Bottom line is Mrs. Whte being a lawyer see this declaration and says to herself and the NFL if we were in court then how can we prove this. She basically MAPPED out how this could be used as proper evidence. The problem the players have at this point though is that it doesn't have to go to court. Goodell is the judge. Sorry!

I was the one that said clearly. What I meant was that it is clear that it does not acknowledge any of those things. White stated on record that the declaration "acknowledged the nature of the program". It does not. It doesn't go into the nature of the program AT ALL. All it does is talk about denying it exists.

White also stated on record that it "acknowledged his participation in it". It does not at all. Go back and read it closely and copy and paste here the exact text that acknowledges his participation. You can't because it isn't there.

White also stated, once again on record, that it "acknowledged that he was told to lie". It does not at all. Once again, show me the exact text that proves that he was told to lie.

Your fellow member Falconidae acknowledges all of this.

You act as though you think I'm the only one who has this opinion. It is now widely excepted in the media that the declaration "clearly" does not relay what Goodell and White claimed that it relayed prior to its appearance in full public view.

You can't defend this. It is right there in black and white. Or rather, it ISN'T there in black and white.