NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[AsylumGuido]

(12-12-2012 12:33 AM)ATLBound Wrote:  I thought there was some other things provided or possibly more evidence

OR

He was talking about the evidence without the benefit of the accusers being cross examined under oath

I think the latter is the best answer

Every scrap of evidence has been presented. And, yes, the second makes more sense. I heard Ginsberg today explaining why the defamation suit is continuing and why he wants the testimony in the appeal hearing made public. He said that Cerullo was repeatedly discredited under cross examination, yet there was no mention of any of that in the 22 page document Tagliabue presented. In fact, Tagliabue relied heavily on Cerullo's statements to support Goodell's original findings.

It appears that this latest hearing was just slightly less of a farce than those held by Goodell himself.

This is FAR from being over, but the tide has turned.