NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[AsylumGuido]

(10-30-2012 02:03 PM)Beef Wrote:  As usual you highlight the portions that you can spin and ignore things like this:


Which of course goes right back to things like "cart-offs" and other evidence that doesn't even come from Cerullo.

Which of course also means that the NFL isn't "resting their case" on Cerullo alone. Yet you insist they are and that's just not true.

And I still find it hilarious that Williams and Cerullo never spoke to each other about the alleged Farve bounty, and that you contend it never existed, but oddly enough they some how came up with the exact same dollar amount of $10k.

I mean, what are the odds? Oh that's right, you think the NFL wrote Williams' and/or Cerullo's statements and they made up the $10k number and Williams and Cerullo just signed them. Because you know, they had to if they ever want back into football. So let's add extortion and bribery to the NFL's offenses I guess.

And forget the fact that you actually admitted a couple pages back that "cart-offs" meant a player was removed from the game for one or more plays. Which is a clear admission that there was a pay for injury program. Because we all know the ONLY reason to leave the field for anything (with regards to being hit) is because the player is hurt. I mean it's not remotely possible to spin that. They paid for hits that hurt other players, period. One play, two plays, the whole game, the rest of the season... it's all the same.

I hope you enjoyed your vacation. You keep expounding on the same issues which have been discussed until we are sick. The supposed $10,000 was public knowledge and may have been a part of a Williams motivational ploy as we (minus you, of course) discussed days ago.

If you can't add anything new maybe you should just avoid the thread. It has a way of upsetting you.

Oh, and they were not punished for paying for hits, a practice the league itself endorsed as long as the pool is player funded, the awards not exorbitant and the hit legal.