NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[ATLBound]

(10-27-2012 03:11 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  Once again, Peyton, I think you have taken the words right out of my mouth. Although, I would like to add that the accusations have been a continually moving target as this has progressed. Yes, when the punishment were reassessed a broader and less constricted reason for the penalties was given, but even if the new accusations could be proven did they warrant the punishments. It was as if he wanted to penalize then regardless of what did or did not happen.

Im still in the boat that says the punishments were tpo severe.

I merely just pointed out the statements for a couple of reasons.

1. So you could stop using that excuse of specific players targeted for intent injure. It was annoying. No offense.

2. To show that this isn't one-sided. Both sides have made mistakes in the process. Which leads me to believe that there was something there but possibly not as severe as it initially seemed.

3. I had to be one-sided in my responses because you were so one-sided.

4. I do think there was a 10k pledge.

5. I'm not so sure if it was serious or not. Thats in the air right now.

6. Cerullo or Gregg...one of them lied, but they didn't lie about the most important piece and thats the 10k pledge from Vilma. We can't ASSUME Goodell lied about them not knowing about eachother's interviews.