|
NFL Saints Bounty Thread
|
|
10-23-2012, 12:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Saints Bounty Thread
(10-23-2012 12:06 AM)AsylumGuido Wrote: Okay, let's go back to the whole basis of the suspensions. The Saints were accused of a three year long ongoing program of placing bounties on opposing players for intentional injury. Sigh...I dont think you understand what assuming means because you continue to do it. It's extremely annoying. Once again if one of them is telling the truth then it doesn't matter. Does it lose credibility? Sure it does but being credible and being truthful are two totally different things. Who cares about the 3 year investigation? It doesn't matter at this point. When the judges ruled in favor of the players it gave the opportunity to the league to reissue the penallties in a manner that fits the evidence the NFL has. Yes, I will say it for you so you wont focus on this one thing that I post....we all understand that you don't think the NFL has evidence...blah blah blah. Who cares that they were initially punished from the intentional injure angle? Once again it has changed. Does the NFL lose some credibility for changing the initial offense? Sure it does but once again it does not mean the bounty program didn't exist. Which is what Radical was eluding to. There were payments made for cart-offs, cart-offs indicate a player being injured, therefore the Saints were paid for injuries that theu caused opposing players. Stop talking about things that don't matter anymore to prove the NFL has holes. We know some of the evidence has holes, but it doesn't mean there weren't any bounties. You're just assuming. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|



