NFL: Saints Bounty Thread

[ATLBound]

(09-03-2012 06:43 PM)Radical Wrote:  You've found a way to consider payments for knocking people out of the game to be different from payments for injury.

This response is for Guido, but this statement is qupted because it is simple and true.

This can't be said enough. Through all the multiple responses this gets lost in the fold. Don't care about the Gregg Williams audio, the ledger, the mike cerullo, the ornstein email, etc. I already broke it down for anybody with reading comprehension. Goodell is using deductive reasoning. This is why he is saying that Vitt and others admitted to it:

1. Saints players got paid for big hits, whacks, etc.

2. Some of those hits or whacks caused injuries and cart-offs

3. Therefore, Saints got paid for big hits that caused injuries and cart-offs

I've always agreed that some of the suspensions were excessive, but that's only from what I have seen so far. I think there is more evidence. You, guido, don't think there is any more evidence. Neither one of us know, but you act as if you know EVERYTHING there is to know about this. You don't know...you only know what you read and you draw your own conclusion from it, but at the same time you fail to realize that conclusion is the most biased out of ANYBODY on this forum.

Once again...let's wait and see the results and while we wait it can be discussed but don't act like you know the whole story.