Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NFL Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
07-30-2011, 01:16 PM
Post: #11
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
(07-30-2011 12:49 PM)Paulitik Wrote:  The rest of the NFC South is just throwing their money away. Expect a lot of cap casualties the next couple years. I'm really happy how frugal TD has been with contracts.

The benefit of having McKay in charge of the rookie pay scale. We could plan all this out WAY ahead of time.

[Image: microbutton-dark.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-30-2011, 01:20 PM
Post: #12
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
TD and Mckay have been working some magic, I really like how we didnt have to overpay for edwards or clabo. I think winning is ultimately the deciding factor to these guys and knowing theyre playing for a winner allows them to take less than they could get on the open market. Thank god we actually have a competent front office for once.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-30-2011, 02:03 PM
Post: #13
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
(07-30-2011 01:20 PM)phalcon phil Wrote:  TD and Mckay have been working some magic, ... Thank god we actually have a competent front office for once.

as i go from thread to thread reading the posts of certain people, i think i need to go reassess my thoughts on what the definition of 'bi-polar' really is

Chew on THAT, Petunia!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-30-2011, 10:42 PM
Post: #14
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
(07-30-2011 01:03 PM)papachaz Wrote:  no it was Porter, and he clearly was trying to run Lynch down, not backpeddling and yes he, like the other 7 saints who couldn't tackle ML on that play WAS ATTEMPTING to make a play
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCI-bAPtBRo&NR=1

but hey i admit i was wrong, it wasn't harper, he didn't even get involved in the play until making that feeble diving attempt at a tackle at about the 2 yard line

Admittedly I have only seen the play once ... when it happened. I refuse to ever watch it again.

Rolleyes

Saints Fan Since 1967
[Image: GuidoSig-vi.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-30-2011, 10:44 PM
Post: #15
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
(07-30-2011 10:42 PM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  Admittedly I have only seen the play once ... when it happened. I refuse to ever watch it again.

Rolleyes

i don't blame you at all guido, i feel the same way about the Dallas playoff game, freaking Rolland Lawrence Sad

Chew on THAT, Petunia!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2011, 09:59 PM
Post: #16
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
OK, OK, I take it back. It's obvious from his outstanding first half performance that Roman Harper deserved that monster contract.

That last play where he held futily on to Starks ankle as Starks drug him into the endzone was particularly amusing.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2011, 10:23 PM
Post: #17
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
But he is a "monster in the box". lol

[Image: Julio150High.png]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2011, 10:26 PM
Post: #18
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
the Taints Homer will tell you how good he was/is. He constantly whined about it when I was saying how bad he was. What ya think now Guido?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2011, 10:28 PM
Post: #19
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
Roman its call Just for Men
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-09-2011, 01:18 AM
Post: #20
RE: Roman Harper - 4 years 28 mil
They abused him tonight. Wow.

Formerly SBC Falcon
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply