|
NFL Listen to Tim Tebow’s comeback against the Bears
|
|
12-18-2011, 04:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Listen to Tim Tebow’s comeback against the Bears
(12-18-2011 03:50 PM)mcsupersport Wrote: The Establishment Clause you so highly push, simply states the Government will not and can not set religion, later Supreme Courts decided it meant something differnent in 1947. Quote from the Wiki: "The phrase "separation of church and state" itself does not appear in the United States Constitution. The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The Supreme Court did not consider the question of how this applied to the states until 1947" Let me quote the exact phrase for you, straight from the Constitution itself. Quote:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. Read that as many times as it takes, because you don't seem to get it. It is against the rules of the Constitution to pass any law that respects an establishment of religion. Tell me, why is alcohol sales banned on Sunday? Because overbearing Christians decided that they need to force their views on the majority. It comes from their brand of Christianity. It is forcing their religion on other people. You can pray in public, the moment you start forcing other people to abide by your religion's rules, you're no longer in the legal right. That's the reality of it. You cannot govern by simple majority rule, it isn't how it works in this country. That's not how the Constitution set this country up to work. We are not a theocracy, we are not a democracy, we are a democratically elected constitutional republic. People vote for their representatives, the representatives work within the framework of the Constitution for the betterment of those who elected them. Just because the majority hold some form of Christian beliefs, does NOT make it ever right to pass laws FORCING Christian laws upon those who do not follow the teachings of Christianity. Really simple. Instead of going somewhere else, I'll gladly stick around and watch through the years as slowly but surely, the wrong doings by the religious majority that illegally enforced their will upon everyone is slowly undone. As for your paragraph about murder, adultery, and theft. You're splitting hairs. You stated that laws against murder, adultery, and theft came from Christianity. It simply isn't true, and I provided a few examples. If you want to split hairs, we could say the Bible condones slavery, but I'm not interested in debating any of this, because it really doesn't matter. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|



