NFL: ESPN's Cowherd predicts, 10-6 falcons?

[ATLBound]

(05-10-2012 11:16 AM)AsylumGuido Wrote:  No. If they had fired Payton and moved Vitt to head coach I would expect as much success. Payton would not have been involved in any of the off-season planning. Vitt would also most likely run things his way and I doubt that would in the long run be as effective.

But the fact is that Payton isn't fired for the year. He was intricately involved during the off-season. Vitt has said that he is not taking over as head coach. He is only fulfilling his duties as assistant head coach and everything will be run just as Payton has always directed.

Will there be an impact? Sure, but not as serious as you hope.

"And why would there be a dip in production?"

This is a quote from you earlier. You obviously indicated earlier that you don't see a drop in production. You jokingly mentioned lowering the point total from 41 to 38.

All I was trying to do is get you to admit there will be an impact from Payton's absence but you're so headstrong and delusional it took you 6 pages to even admit that and that process you have essentially contradicted yourself. So to give you a change I ask

If you can finally foresee an impact from Payton's absence, then why do not see a dip in production?

I also ask how many games do you see Payton's absence affecting? 1, 2, 3, maybe none...how many?

I already told you his impact alone I can see 3-4 games impacted by Payton's absence.