If Coleman is healthy...who should start?

[Radical]

(09-20-2010 03:50 PM)Sun Tzu 7 Wrote:  I don't know.

While I liked what I saw from Moore there were a few times he drew a flag and I forget what the penalty(s) was/were exactly...

He made a late hit and Weatherspoon did something as well, on the same play. Then later on one gets a sack, and another an interception. Thought it was kinda funny.

[nativefalcon]

(09-20-2010 03:36 PM)Slamee101 Wrote:  I really liked what I saw from William Moore, and while I liked what Coleman gave us 2 years ago I think age (or injuries) might be catching up to him.

Just wondered what others thought...

I like Coleman but William Moore is da future, he needs the starts, but maybe not against the saints. Whoever is healthier. Moore made some mistakes, but he made some plays too.

[Joker]

(09-20-2010 04:26 PM)nativefalcon Wrote:  I like Coleman but William Moore is da future, he needs the starts, but maybe not against the saints. Whoever is healthier. Moore made some mistakes, but he made some plays too.

I agree.. hard to keep that guy out of there.. he is a PLAYMAKER.. Coleman simply fills a spot

[jddurden]

I think its time for Coleman to take over a mentor-like position, even thoughs he's only 29 (I think), but Moore is a playmaker if he can stay healthy

[Snelling44]

Moore. Coleman was supposed to be a stop-gap for Lawyer Milloy. Moore was drafted as the future and he needs to get in there and play. No use in keeping him on the bench. He didn't look bad either vs. the Cardinals.

[HashMark]

I Think Moore For The Fact Hes a PlayMaker , & Its The Saints and He Will Help Out Alot!

Also Better To Have Him Get Acuainted With That Offense Sooner In The Year Than In Week 15 (i think) or When Even We Play Them Again.

[keithbrooking56]

Moore without doubt. He is younger, more talented and frankly we need to see if he was worth the second round pick to be a reliable starter at safety for years to come.

[TonyGraziani]

The bad thing for Coleman is that this just isn't old vet vs. young prospect, its worse player vs. better player. I really feel like Moore is better from what he has shown and what Coleman hasn't. I was gonna vote Coleman because I didn't trust Moore against their playaction, then I realized Coleman bites so bad he shoulda been an extra in twilight. Moore > Coleman. JMHO.

[Ballfan]

(09-20-2010 04:27 PM)Joker Wrote:  I agree.. hard to keep that guy out of there.. he is a PLAYMAKER.. Coleman simply fills a spot

This is what I have been saying. I'm not sure why so many are high on Coleman. More can play the run and pass equally well.

[Radical]

Coleman isn't a major liability though. The guy isn't like Jason Webster, Jimmy Williams, or Doug Johnson... guys that HURT the team when they're on the field. Coleman just isn't very talented, but will get the job done for the most part.