I don't really think the problem is Mike Mularkey

[Tandy]

(10-19-2010 02:22 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  [quote]

?? not sure what your confused about there Tandy ..The team was in position to win a game Ryan lead us down to drive..Out of those 8 come back wins how many of those games was for his porous play

6 out of 8 of Ryan comeback wins he had a Passer Rating under a below avg 80

That is why maybe we as a team were in position to win that game outside Ryan poor play either defense kept us in the game or run whatever case may be but Ryan made a play when need be so .It might not have been pretty but it was a win

Go back to the link. Read the article by the guy. He's very specific about what he credits to the QB.

Next time - follow the link - and read the information.

[Swift Is a Die Hard]

I just saw the stats in the link . I'm reading article now . I look at comeback wins and winning drives different . If a QB is playing a good sound game but losing and leads is team down for the go ahead score I give him more credit then when a QB is having a bad game all around and then leads team to winning drive I look at it different . I see in 6 out of 8 Ryan game winning drive games Ryan had a poor under 80 passer rating . A win is a win and any QB that can rack up wins is okay on my part but that should not be the sole defining stat how you judge a QB

[Radical]

(10-19-2010 02:22 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  It opens the offense up ..

Kolb /Vick have one of the worst olines...how come they have a offense that goes down field

Rodgers sits behind one of the worst olines in the league ..how come they attack down field

Its really simple...Oline is made a issue for a team that is not "" softening up a defense" no defense respects our QB or our passing game..Load the box /force Ryan to beat them and stop Turner and send blit packages and force hot reads

Football is not that complicated ..either you have it or you dont...Our offense is struggling cause numerous reasons ..

1) QB play ..in accurate/ doesnt throw a good deep ball
2) inconsistent oline play to sustain blocks or open holes
3) Mularkey scheme to open things up and not just playbook but open up middle of field
4) wrs not being able to get in separation from corners.

I watch their offensive line yesterday and I watched Kolb. Sometimes he had time, and sometimes he had none at all. I've watched the Packers as well, Rodgers takes a lot of sacks, but he also has superior receiving options. Greg Jennings isn't as good as Roddy White, but I'd take Donald Driver all day over Michael Jenkins.

Regardless, there is NO solution for an offensive line that giving up pressure to 3 and 4 man rushes like they're being all out blitzed. It hasn't been a case lately of teams loading the box and rushing 5 or more, it has been teams dropping off entirely and STILL getting a rush with just their down linemen. You can't go deep on that because you're asking for an interception and you aren't going to have time to set up the deep pass anyways.

We've gone down field with mixed success this year. The full-house play-action deep pass was a thing of beauty, but when Ryan is getting hit more than 75% of the time on just the short/medium range throws, it is ridiculous to suggest that simply "going deep" is going to solve our problems.

It starts with the offensive line. An offensive line that gets pushed back 1-2 yards on run plays and gives up consistent pressure against 3-4 man rushes is going to stall any offense, no matter who the OC, QB, or skill position players are.