Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fitz available for trade
01-27-2011, 07:35 PM
Post: #11
RE: Fitz available for trade
[Image: 1232z3s.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 07:36 PM
Post: #12
RE: Fitz available for trade
They key word is 'could' make him available for trade.

I'd be all for it if it was possible.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 07:42 PM (This post was last modified: 01-27-2011 07:43 PM by nativefalcon.)
Post: #13
RE: Fitz available for trade
(01-27-2011 06:26 PM)kane#7 Wrote:  Would a 1st, Redman and a 4th do it... If they still play 3-4 give them JA98 (would be good in a 3-4)

I would be good with this, because think about it, TD can find players and the cap is going to be a lot higher, meaning, we still could bring in some free agents. Also we wouldn't have to necessarily give them it all this year. like a 1st this year and a 3rd next year and JA98 and JPW or Redmen. Wink Bring him home TD, or get Malcolm Floyd from the Chargers, be a lot cheaper.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 07:46 PM (This post was last modified: 01-27-2011 07:47 PM by Swift Is a Die Hard.)
Post: #14
RE: Fitz available for trade
(01-27-2011 07:32 PM)Radical Wrote:  No... Mularkey has no idea how to use two star WRs in an offense.

Mike Mularkey - OC for the Steelers from 01 to 03.

I should have said more complex for Mularky to figure out ways to use Fitz & Roddy and also Tony G .. or should I say our QB ?

Tommy Maddox also threw a better deep ball then Ryan

[Image: jenkinscatch_medium.jpg]

I'm delusional from our playoff loss against GB . Don't take me seriously until year 2413 .
- Added by Phocis because of this post. Warned here. Do not remove.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 07:52 PM (This post was last modified: 01-27-2011 08:02 PM by Radical.)
Post: #15
RE: Fitz available for trade
(01-27-2011 07:46 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  I should have said more complex for Mularky to figure out ways to use Fitz & Roddy and also Tony G .. or should I say our QB ?

Tommy Maddox also threw a better deep ball then Ryan

Tommy Maddox also sucked as a QB. Matt Ryan will be able to better utilize two star WRs better than Maddox ever could. BUT HERP DERP HE THROWS FURTHER(a 7.5 YPA and 6.6 YPA the next year shows how much of a "deep threat" he is.)

Are you honestly going to start insulting Matt Ryan's football intelligence now? You try so hard it's sad.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 08:07 PM
Post: #16
RE: Fitz available for trade
Maybe Fitz doesnt slip in this spot in playoff game when ball is thrown late and like a girl ? so Fitz can help out our QB who cant even throw a 30 yard fly route without ball hanging in air forever ..

Lets blame Jenkins though he wasnt open or anything


LINK FOR THROW

[Image: jenkinscatch_medium.jpg]

I'm delusional from our playoff loss against GB . Don't take me seriously until year 2413 .
- Added by Phocis because of this post. Warned here. Do not remove.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 08:28 PM
Post: #17
RE: Fitz available for trade
(01-27-2011 08:07 PM)Swift Is a Die Hard Wrote:  Maybe Fitz doesnt slip in this spot in playoff game when ball is thrown late and like a girl ? so Fitz can help out our QB who cant even throw a 30 yard fly route without ball hanging in air forever ..

Because clearly Ryan was trying his damndest to put it in there was as much velocity as possible. There's no way Ryan wasn't trying to put air in the ball and drop it into a spot and just threw it late.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 09:03 PM
Post: #18
RE: Fitz available for trade
A 2 and a 4. Do it. NOW.

"The Lord say in your heart you should bare no hate/ But I flip the world a Dirty Bird, I aint no saint"- Kaedus
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 09:10 PM
Post: #19
RE: Fitz available for trade
(01-27-2011 07:32 PM)Radical Wrote:  No... Mularkey has no idea how to use two star WRs in an offense.

Mike Mularkey - OC for the Steelers from 01 to 03.


Did Mularkey do OK with Ward and Burress?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-27-2011, 09:36 PM
Post: #20
RE: Fitz available for trade
I step away from what has been said before. Larry Fitzgerald is 27 years old and has averaged 1200+ yardage and 10 TD's per year for the last 4 years and if someone doesn't think he would not improve the Falcons passing game needs to inhale and think.

Do you realize how the opposing DC would say WTF when he had designed his defense to stop Turner.

I love the Falcons and to hell with anyone who doesn't!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply