Falcons: Peter king on the Dirk Koetter hire

[atljbo]

Quote:6. I think the Dirk Koetter hire in Atlanta is a nod to the fact that the Falcons wanted to throw the ball downfield more, and to improving their screen game (maybe in 2012 with Jacquizz Rogers). Koetter's not Mike Martz, but I do think he'll be more open to featuring Julio Jones and getting Matt Ryan to take three or four shots a game deep.

7. I think this shouldn't be a sign that Mike Mularkey wasn't a good hire in Jacksonville, because Mularkey is smart and a good quarterback teacher. But as the Falcons offensive coordinator he'd hit a wall with Matt Ryan, and the Falcons needed to make a change, and I believe if he wouldn't have gotten the head-coaching job with the Jags, the Falcons would have strongly considered making a change at the coordinator spot.

Sidenote:

Quote:10. Atlanta (10-7). Coordinator wish list on defense? All Spags, all the time.

[Paprika Neck]

peter king needs to stop copy/paste the things i say

[papachaz]

(01-16-2012 12:47 PM)Paprika Neck Wrote:  peter king needs to stop copy/paste the things i say

nice attempt to stay incognito there pap, but now it comes out!! so NOW we know your true identity.....



LMAO

[Beef]

I still believe that Mike Bell has an account on these forums.

It's happened way too often that we will begin discussing something here and then the next day on the radio, Mike Bell will have the same exact discussion. And I'm talking about some of our very obscure topics and sometimes videos and links to supporting evidence. Things that he is too lazy to research on his own, for instance. Stats that have been pieced together by someone here on their own and not copy/pasted from some national media article. Out of the blue he will toss out something that was posted here almost verbatim.

[Paprika Neck]

im going to listen to him more often.

[phocis850]

(01-16-2012 07:48 PM)Paprika Neck Wrote:  im going to listen to him more often.

King predicted that we were gonna win the SB this year also. Just sayin.

[Paulitik]

(01-16-2012 07:05 PM)Beef Wrote:  I still believe that Mike Bell has an account on these forums.

It's happened way too often that we will begin discussing something here and then the next day on the radio, Mike Bell will have the same exact discussion. And I'm talking about some of our very obscure topics and sometimes videos and links to supporting evidence. Things that he is too lazy to research on his own, for instance. Stats that have been pieced together by someone here on their own and not copy/pasted from some national media article. Out of the blue he will toss out something that was posted here almost verbatim.

Not sure he's on the boards, he's got somebody that emails him the stuff posted on here. he mentioned the XandOlabs article about Koettner's offense that was on the board the other day. He said one of the listeners emailed it to him.

I talk to him a good bit via email and text. Still waiting on my applebee's gift cards I supposedly won for the stuff he read on air. Archer and Bell is great. It's like listening to one of the AFMB arguments in real life, the only negative is that every other caller is Swift.

[juraitwaluzka]

(01-17-2012 02:40 AM)Paulitik Wrote:  Not sure he's on the boards, he's got somebody that emails him the stuff posted on here. he mentioned the XandOlabs article about Koettner's offense that was on the board the other day. He said one of the listeners emailed it to him.

I talk to him a good bit via email and text. Still waiting on my applebee's gift cards I supposedly won for the stuff he read on air. Archer and Bell is great. It's like listening to one of the AFMB arguments in real life, the only negative is that every other caller is Swift.

There is always Mel.