Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

Post Reply

Thread Rating:

2 Votes - 3 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Falcons Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

12-15-2011, 08:25 PM

Post: #30

Peyton Offline

Offline

The Dude

Posts: 11,945
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 59

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

I agree with Beef about what has happened to the Falcons offense, but I don't agree with the reason it has happened. It's a natural progression for a cerebral QB like Ryan. As a matter of fact, if Ryan wasn't capable of taken on that kind of role, he would be a fairly worthless QB, because he is very average in pretty much every other way.

Find all posts by this user

Quote this message in a reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Post Reply

Messages In This Thread

Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - xstealth - 12-15-2011, 01:15 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - juraitwaluzka - 12-15-2011, 01:26 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - papachaz - 12-15-2011, 02:07 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 02:34 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 09:06 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 12:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Hit Stick - 12-15-2011, 10:48 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - illmusic - 12-15-2011, 02:16 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Radical - 12-15-2011, 03:26 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Jesus - 12-15-2011, 08:19 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - JDaveG - 12-15-2011, 08:32 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 10:24 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - xstealth - 12-15-2011, 10:30 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 10:34 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Hit Stick - 12-15-2011, 10:51 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 11:13 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - JOEinPHX - 12-15-2011, 11:14 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 11:17 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 12:48 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 07:20 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 08:16 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 08:49 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-15-2011, 10:55 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - FullMetalFalcon23 - 12-15-2011, 01:01 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 01:32 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-15-2011, 01:36 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 01:47 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 01:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 01:53 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - FullMetalFalcon23 - 12-15-2011, 04:16 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011 08:25 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 08:58 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 09:04 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 09:21 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 08:59 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 09:12 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Radical - 12-15-2011, 09:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-16-2011, 12:42 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-16-2011, 02:01 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-16-2011, 05:47 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-17-2011, 02:59 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-17-2011, 06:44 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - illmusic - 12-16-2011, 03:48 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:36 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:54 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - papachaz - 12-17-2011, 12:18 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - phocis850 - 12-17-2011, 09:19 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:24 PM