Falcons: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

[Beef]

(12-15-2011 12:48 PM)cooperbh Wrote:  Keep in mind this is the same group of people who blame Mularkey when receivers drop easy passes.

This is the kind of shit i'm talking about. This statement is not true.

I don't want MM fired.
I don't blame him for receivers dropping passes.
I don't blame him for Matt having stints of inaccuracy.
I don't blame him for our O-line sucking.
I don't blame him for our RB's missing holes or falling down when someone touches their shoe laces with a pinky finger.

Yet, you still keep lumping me and others like me into this "group" that you keep F'ing crying about like a whiny baby.

And Dave Archer owns you up and down. I didn't say Mike Bell knew shit, he simply asked the question on the radio the other day to Archer, and what I explained is what Archer said. And he happens to contradict you quite a bit. And the fact that he's a fucking Falcon employee and correspondent who gets to talk to all the coaches and all the players as much as he wants whenever he wants, you sound like an imbicile for suggesting you know more about how this offense is really run than he does.

And like I said, you fail to use logic with regards to MM. If he was soooo good, then why are we moving away from him being in 100% control and moving much closer to Ryan having total autonomy? If he's soooo good, then why are we playing better when Ryan has more control running the game from the no-huddle where he calls the plays than when MM calls all the plays?

What part of the fact we are playing better with Ryan calling the plays rather than MM do you not fucking understand?

And stop saying the word "agenda" for christ sakes if you're going to sit there and shove one of your own down our throats. Hypocrite.