Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

Post Reply

Thread Rating:

2 Votes - 3 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Falcons Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

12-15-2011, 01:53 PM

Post: #26

Peyton Offline

Offline

The Dude

Posts: 11,945
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 59

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

The offense has struggled at times this year, but I haven't seen many things that I felt were scheme related and the only problem I've seen with Ryan is his accuracy at times. The biggest problems have been WRs dropping balls and making mental mistakes and an OL that has been slow to gel because they usually have one guy playing completely incompetently out there.

Find all posts by this user

Quote this message in a reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Post Reply

Messages In This Thread

Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - xstealth - 12-15-2011, 01:15 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - juraitwaluzka - 12-15-2011, 01:26 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - papachaz - 12-15-2011, 02:07 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 02:34 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 09:06 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 12:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Hit Stick - 12-15-2011, 10:48 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - illmusic - 12-15-2011, 02:16 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Radical - 12-15-2011, 03:26 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Jesus - 12-15-2011, 08:19 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - JDaveG - 12-15-2011, 08:32 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 10:24 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - xstealth - 12-15-2011, 10:30 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 10:34 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Hit Stick - 12-15-2011, 10:51 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 11:13 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - JOEinPHX - 12-15-2011, 11:14 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 11:17 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 12:48 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 07:20 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 08:16 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 08:49 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-15-2011, 10:55 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - FullMetalFalcon23 - 12-15-2011, 01:01 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 01:32 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-15-2011, 01:36 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 01:47 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 01:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011 01:53 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - FullMetalFalcon23 - 12-15-2011, 04:16 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 08:25 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 08:58 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 09:04 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 09:21 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 08:59 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 09:12 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Radical - 12-15-2011, 09:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-16-2011, 12:42 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-16-2011, 02:01 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-16-2011, 05:47 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-17-2011, 02:59 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-17-2011, 06:44 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - illmusic - 12-16-2011, 03:48 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:36 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:54 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - papachaz - 12-17-2011, 12:18 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - phocis850 - 12-17-2011, 09:19 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:24 PM