Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

Thread Rating:

2 Votes - 3 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Falcons Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

12-15-2011, 12:48 PM

Post: #20

cooperbh Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 1,263
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 50

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD

(12-15-2011 10:24 AM)Peyton Wrote: The problem I have with the people who bash on MM is that every time Matt audibles to a play that doesn't work, which is extremely often, MM gets blamed for it. That just doesn't make any sense to me.

Keep in mind this is the same group of people who blame Mularkey when receivers drop easy passes.

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - xstealth - 12-15-2011, 01:15 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - juraitwaluzka - 12-15-2011, 01:26 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - papachaz - 12-15-2011, 02:07 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 02:34 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 09:06 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 12:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Hit Stick - 12-15-2011, 10:48 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - illmusic - 12-15-2011, 02:16 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Radical - 12-15-2011, 03:26 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Jesus - 12-15-2011, 08:19 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - JDaveG - 12-15-2011, 08:32 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 10:24 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - xstealth - 12-15-2011, 10:30 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 10:34 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Hit Stick - 12-15-2011, 10:51 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 11:13 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - JOEinPHX - 12-15-2011, 11:14 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 11:17 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011 12:48 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 07:20 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 08:16 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 08:49 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-15-2011, 10:55 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - FullMetalFalcon23 - 12-15-2011, 01:01 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 01:32 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-15-2011, 01:36 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 01:47 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 01:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 01:53 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - FullMetalFalcon23 - 12-15-2011, 04:16 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 08:25 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 08:58 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 09:04 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-15-2011, 09:21 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-15-2011, 08:59 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-15-2011, 09:12 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Radical - 12-15-2011, 09:45 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - RnB - 12-16-2011, 12:42 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-16-2011, 02:01 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-16-2011, 05:47 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - cooperbh - 12-17-2011, 02:59 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Beef - 12-17-2011, 06:44 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - illmusic - 12-16-2011, 03:48 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:36 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:54 AM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - papachaz - 12-17-2011, 12:18 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - phocis850 - 12-17-2011, 09:19 PM

RE: Mularkey is just that, and he had nothing to do with Rodgers TD - Peyton - 12-17-2011, 09:24 PM