Falcons: Grantland on The Loss

[AUTiger7222]

(11-13-2012 09:07 PM)ATLBound Wrote:  You said it was an article bashing Smith and how we will never win with him, but it wasn't. Thats how I gathered it.

It was an article expressinf how he thought Smith made a mistake in not going for two and how that decision affected the rest of the game.

Matter of fact to quote the FIRST SENTENCE OF THE LAST PARAGRAPH

"Mike Smith's an EXCELLENT HEAD COACH. He's good enough, in fact, that I'm tempted to find excuses to figure out....blah blah blah."

He questioned ONE decision that Smith made and thats what you call bashing and we will never win with him????

No I was talking about your posting saying it's an article saying how not going for 2 didn't matter. You said that is what the article was about. I disagree. The article was about how not going for 2 changed the rest of the game. And what makes you think we would have gotten the 2? We had 3 plays right from the goal line at the end of the game and couldn't put it in the end zone because our short yardage offense sucks. We wouldn't have gotten the 2 point play and then we would have been in the exact same situation we ended up in anyway.