Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 3 Votes - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Falcons Football Gameplan's 2012 NFL Team Preview - Falcons
06-28-2012, 09:14 AM (This post was last modified: 06-28-2012 08:02 PM by Beef.)
Post: #8
RE: Football Gameplan's 2012 NFL Team Preview - Falcons
(06-27-2012 11:35 PM)EmDiggy Wrote:  There's a reason why you get bounced out of the 1st round of the playoffs.. Its not that people "hate the Falcons", its because there's some serious underlying issues there. Here's a couple that stand out to me:

1. Lack of Depth - It shows at certain positions (DE, OL, DB) now this year they have addressed the DB issue imho..but the other two are still question marks

2. No complexity to the offense - In all honesty, its easy to defend the Falcons. Beat Turner to the LOS, get the Falcons in 3rd and 7+, Blitz Matt Ryan. Until they start to attack downfield, it'll be more of the same.

Like I said in the video, the Falcons are fundamentally sound and don't beat themselves.. Which is why the games are always close (Time of Possession and lack of self-inflicted wounds). Just off Football talent alone, they can win 9-11 games..but when they face a team that puts them in pressure situations, you'll see more of the same.

Maybe this will change with Dirk Koetter & Mike Nolan..but we shall see

Hope that answers your question... I tend to ramble Smile

So you've based your decision on prior styles of play alone and totally disregarded what everyone knows about Nolan's style and the fact that Koetter and Smith have already openly stated we will finally have a screen game and use Quizz and other RBs more and Turner less.

If you go to the Falcons site and watch the interview videos from offensive players, they ALL keep saying that the defense looks completely different, that they are constantly being fooled by amazing blitz packages they've never seen them do before and the pressure is ramped up almost 10-fold.

You mentioned depth as an issue, but it's not. It's not like after Abraham and Edwards we have nobody but junk. Biermann and Sidbury should thrive in Nolan's style. Matthews and Massaquoi are unknown commodities and can't just be prematurely labeled. And after Babs and Peters it's not like Jerry and Walker suck, they are both very good rotational players. And the new kid, Robertson is beastly strong and raw.

LB is actually a strong suit. Spoon is going to be a top 3 LB and a sure probowler this year. Dent lead the special teams in tackles as a rookie, and he's a LB. He's not even a gunner and he wracked up crazy tackle numbers. Tatupu has a ton to prove and he's in incredible shape right now. And Nicholas is a starter on 25 teams in this league at OLB because he's that solid. That's 4 LBs and we're going to be in the big nickel only playing 2 of them the majority of the time.

As for our secondary, with Robinson on the inside embracing that role, and 2 of the best cover corners in the league on the outside and one of the best cover safeties and hardest hitters in Moore, along with Nolan's pressure system forcing QBs to make hasty throws, there's no question we'll be significantly improved on defense as a whole.

Now take out Mularkey's predictable play calling, his horrible short hook and out routes on every passing down, no screen game, and Turner up the middle 35x a game, and you've improved our offense by default. Now add to that the emergence of Julio, Quizz, and receivers being thrown to in stride, and Matt working out being noticeably stronger and throwing harder.

The OL is really the only question mark. But other than LT, you can't question depth on the OL any longer. We have 3 centers and 6 guards now. We just have to figure out which ones can hold down the middle and RG best. Nobody is happy about LT, but if we're strong as hell at 21 other positions, 1 average to below average bad apple isn't a team killer. Svitek can do the job just fine if Baker can't. We already know this.

Getting our RBs involved in the short passing game with screens and dumps alone could solve all of our OL woes as it is.

Basing your decision on prior performance when you know it won't look or be the same makes your analysis inaccurate by default.

There's no question we're going to be an improved team over last year, and yet you have us missing the playoffs with Carolina leap-frogging us somehow. You media guys are so caught up on the Cam hype, as if this isn't a team sport and he can win it by himself with significantly more pockets of average talent around him compared to us.

Not one of you're better mental projections this round, Digs. You can't use the fact you don't know what will change so you have to go by last year as a basis for anything. That's lazy analysis. You have to dig deeper and make educated decisions. Saying maybe Nolan and Koetter will change things when it's an absolute certainty they already have and then ignoring the differences and just going off old data isn't how you make educated predictions on accurate basis.

[Image: sexy-hot-girl-dancing-3-o.gif] [Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSupbgNd4tN3Uxraa9Dz1h...mp;amp;t=1]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Football Gameplan's 2012 NFL Team Preview - Falcons - Beef - 06-28-2012 09:14 AM