|
Falcons Falcons built for long haul[Fox]
|
|
10-18-2012, 11:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-18-2012 11:49 PM by RFlagg.)
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox]
(10-18-2012 06:09 PM)AUTiger7222 Wrote: Me too. I love how Billick is fair in that way for all teams. To contrast that, I heard Dita on the radio today and he talked about the Falcons real quick. His thoughts: "I'm not impressed by the Falcons. They've won every game by 3the or less and I think they'll fold under pressure." I then began screaming at the radio "You dumb asshole, we won against KC and SD by double digits, Washington is better than people realize, Carolina had 10 days to prepare and Oakland had 2 weeks." Lost a lot of respect for Dita there. The Man In Black
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - Polar Bear Jones - 10-18-2012, 02:52 AM
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - Drathdon - 10-18-2012, 03:59 AM
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - AUTiger7222 - 10-18-2012, 03:27 PM
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - RnB - 10-18-2012, 02:34 PM
Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - juraitwaluzka - 10-18-2012, 04:54 PM
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - AUTiger7222 - 10-18-2012, 06:09 PM
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - RFlagg - 10-18-2012 11:48 PM
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - AUTiger7222 - 10-18-2012, 11:56 PM
Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - juraitwaluzka - 10-19-2012, 12:56 AM
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - papachaz - 10-19-2012, 01:07 AM
RE: Falcons built for long haul[Fox] - RockHoward - 10-19-2012, 05:59 AM
|




