Falcons: 7-9

[triggerman]

our team has not improved from last year.
our qb still lacks the fortitude to throw the ball to make a play.
our pass rush was decent, the entire secondary is bad, real bad.
i just wonder when some others will begin to question what exactly Dimitroff is doing?

[BullRush]

Well he's(me too) going off actual data and performance.
I can't honestly say we are the dominant team everyone says we are. We haven't proven it. We arent a bad team either but aren't the #3 power ranked team everyone thinks we are

[triggerman]

(09-11-2011 06:47 PM)BullRush Wrote:  Well he's(me too) going off actual data and performance.
I can't honestly say we are the dominant team everyone says we are. We haven't proven it. We arent a bad team either but aren't the #3 power ranked team everyone thinks we are

i know one thing, we NEVER EVER EVER win the big games. This one was big as the nfcs champ squared off with the NFCC champ. both teams looking to prove they are a step away from the big game. 1 team did, we showed that we are not even close

[Radical]

(09-11-2011 06:55 PM)triggerman Wrote:  i know one thing, we NEVER EVER EVER win the big games. This one was big as the nfcs champ squared off with the NFCC champ. both teams looking to prove they are a step away from the big game. 1 team did, we showed that we are not even close

Saints in their house, Ravens on MNF, and the Packers.

If those weren't big games, then there's no such thing as big games.

[phalcon phil]

(09-11-2011 07:17 PM)Radical Wrote:  Saints in their house, Ravens on MNF, and the Packers.

If those weren't big games, then there's no such thing as big games.

We've won some pretty big games, but we will NEVER win the one's that matter with this kind of offensive mindset. NEVER.

[triggerman]

(09-11-2011 07:17 PM)Radical Wrote:  Saints in their house, Ravens on MNF, and the Packers.

If those weren't big games, then there's no such thing as big games.

packers were struggling when we played them.

saints was week 3 and we weren't considered much of a team at 9-7.
we were totally out played at that game, but we did get a lucky win
i was there.

ravens, well it was the ravens no one thinks much of them.
they are good, but not a BIG game by anyones standards

[Radical]

(09-11-2011 07:20 PM)triggerman Wrote:  saints was week 3 and we weren't considered much of a team at 9-7.
we were totally out played at that game, but we did get a lucky win
i was there.

ravens, well it was the ravens no one thinks much of them.
they are good, but not a BIG game by anyones standards

You're trying too hard.

[phalcon phil]

We've won some BIG games you can't take that away from this squad. That's why I don't understand the vaginal approach to game planning and execution.

[triggerman]

(09-11-2011 07:26 PM)Radical Wrote:  You're trying too hard.

you dont have an answer.

lemme know about the big games like playoffs, or against pats indy steelers, etc.

perennial top teams, those are big games.

how we do?

[triggerman]

(09-11-2011 07:27 PM)phalcon phil Wrote:  We've won some BIG games you can't take that away from this squad. That's why I don't understand the vaginal approach to game planning and execution.

which ones?