College: Brian VanGorder has accepted the defensive coordinator job at Auburn University.

[Jonesy]

(01-09-2012 06:06 PM)Peyton Wrote:  If this forum had a HOF I would move this thread into it right now.

In fact, I think I am going to create a HOF specifically to put this thread in.

Please do. LOL! This is too awesome.

+1

[keithbrooking56]

(01-09-2012 06:07 PM)Peyton Wrote:  Answer this question. Did 26 teams have more sacks than the Falcons this year?

No, you answer my question. Did the Falcons have the fifth lowest sack total (tied) in a thirty two team league? Yes or no.

[keithbrooking56]

(01-09-2012 06:08 PM)Jonesy Wrote:  Please do. LOL! This is too awesome.

+1

I guess one thread wasn't enough to contain your asshole nature.

[lsmalls15]

(01-09-2012 06:04 PM)keithbrooking56 Wrote:  No, they are not. They are tied for 27th. They have the fifth lowest sack total in a 32 team league. I can't believe I'm seriously wasting my time having to explain this. Fifth lowest sack total (tied) is 27th in a 32 team league. Good grief!

Is this dude serious? Surely you jest.

[Peyton]

(01-09-2012 06:09 PM)keithbrooking56 Wrote:  No, you answer my question. Did the Falcons have the fifth lowest sack total (tied) in a thirty two team league? Yes or no.

No, they most certainly did not. In fact 11 teams were worse than them.

[Peyton]

(01-09-2012 06:11 PM)lsmalls15 Wrote:  Is this dude serious? Surely you jest?

That's what I thought at first.

[keithbrooking56]

(01-09-2012 06:11 PM)Peyton Wrote:  No, they most certainly did not. In fact 10 teams were worse than them.

Wrong answer. Those other teams TIED for a number lower than the Falcons. Just as the Falcons TIED for the fifth lowest number.

[Knight of God]

http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_...asontype/2

Seems to show 26 other teams with a higher sack total than the Falcons.

[Peyton]

(01-09-2012 06:09 PM)keithbrooking56 Wrote:  No, you answer my question. Did the Falcons have the fifth lowest sack total (tied) in a thirty two team league? Yes or no.

Besides the fact that your question is irrelevant, the answer is still no.

I can't believe I actually have to actually type this, but rankings are never calculated from the bottom up.

Even if we used your logic that ties count only as one position, that would make the Falcons 10th out of 15 different positions, not 27th out of 32.

[Peyton]

(01-09-2012 06:13 PM)keithbrooking56 Wrote:  Wrong answer. Those other teams TIED for a number lower than the Falcons. Just as the Falcons TIED for the fifth lowest number.

No, each team has their own total. The fact that some of the other teams have the same total is irrelevant.

Either way, there is no way the Falcons could be 27th in sacks when only 18 teams had more sacks.

Not under any scenario, no matter how retarded.

And the one you are cooking up is pretty retarded.